Shared and distinct factors driving attention and temporal processing across modalities.
Shared and distinct factors driving attention and temporal processing across modalities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.020
复制
发表时间：
2014-03
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Lustig, Cindy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berry, Anne S.;Li, Xu;Lin, Ziyong;Lustig, Cindy
除了“声音的判断时间比光线长”这一经典发现之外，听觉刺激的时间通常比视觉刺激的时间更精确和准确。在时间处理的认知模型中，这些通道差异的解释是，假设听觉刺激更自动地捕获和保持注意力，更有效地关闭注意力开关，允许积累标记时间流逝的脉冲。然而，注意是一个多方面的结构，很少有人试图确定注意的哪些方面可能与通道效应有关。我们使用了视觉和听觉版本的连续时间预期任务(CTET)，这是一种计时任务，以前与走神和注意力疏忽的行为和电生理测量有关，并测试了在有或没有视频分心的情况下的参与者。听觉条件下的表现通常优于视觉条件下的表现，复制了计时文献中的标准结果。听觉通道也较少受到持续注意力下降的影响，而持续注意力的下降是由于随着时间的推移而导致的表现下降。相反，在两种模式下，分心对表现的影响是相同的。对个体表现差异的分析揭示了两种模式之间的进一步差异：听觉条件下的糟糕表现主要与无聊有关，而视觉条件下的糟糕表现主要与分心有关。这些结果表明：1)对注意的不同方面的挑战揭示了通道特定和非特定对时间加工的影响；2)不同因素在不同通道测试时会导致个体差异。
In addition to the classic finding that “sounds are judged longer than lights,” the timing of auditory stimuli is often more precise and accurate than is the timing of visual stimuli. In cognitive models of temporal processing, these modality differences are explained by positing that auditory stimuli more automatically capture and hold attention, more efficiently closing an attentional switch that allows the accumulation of pulses marking the passage of time. However, attention is a multifaceted construct, and there has been little attempt to determine which aspects of attention may be related to modality effects. We used visual and auditory versions of the Continuous Temporal Expectancy Task (CTET) a timing task previously linked to behavioral and electrophysiological measures of mind-wandering and attention lapses, and tested participants with or without the presence of a video distractor. Performance in the auditory condition was generally superior to that in the visual condition, replicating standard results in the timing literature. The auditory modality was also less affected by declines in sustained attention indexed by declines in performance over time. In contrast, distraction had an equivalent impact on performance in the two modalities. Analysis of individual differences in performance revealed further differences between the two modalities: Poor performance in the auditory condition was primarily related to boredom whereas poor performance in the visual condition was primarily related to distractibility. These results suggest that: 1) challenges to different aspects of attention reveal both modality-specific and nonspecific effects on temporal processing, and 2) different factors drive individual differences when testing across modalities.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
--
作者：
GOLDSTONE, S;GOLDFARB, JL
通讯作者：
GOLDFARB, JL
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Collier, GL;Logan, G
通讯作者：
Logan, G
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Demeter, Elise;Guthrie, Sally K.;Lustig, Cindy
通讯作者：
Lustig, Cindy
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Bakeman, R
通讯作者：
Bakeman, R
DOI：
10.1080/02724980343000495
发表时间：
2004-07-01
期刊：
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子：
--
作者：
Droit-Volet, S;Tourret, S;Wearden, J
通讯作者：
Wearden, J