Interventions to promote dementia knowledge among racial/ethnic minority groups: A systematic review.
Interventions to promote dementia knowledge among racial/ethnic minority groups: A systematic review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/jgs.17495
复制
发表时间：
2022-03
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
Xu, Hanzhang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Huggins, Lenique K. L.;Min, Se Hee;Dennis, Chelsea-Ann;Ostbye, Truls;Johnson, Kimberly S.;Xu, Hanzhang
某些种族/少数民族群体患痴呆症的风险较高，但研究表明，他们对这种疾病的知识和理解往往有限。越来越多的教育和宣传计划已经制定，以促进痴呆症的知识。我们的目的是评估目前的证据和质量的教育干预措施，以促进痴呆症的知识。我们搜索了以英语发表的干预研究，这些研究侧重于在种族/少数民族群体中促进痴呆症知识的教育干预。我们通过PubMed、PsycInfo、CINAHL和Scopus使用定制的检索词确定了25项相关研究。我们筛选标题和摘要，审查全文，综合相关证据，并根据混合方法评价工具评价研究质量。相关的干预研究在社区、医院或诊所、学校和网上进行。大多数研究在美国（n = 21）进行，其次是英国（n = 3）。超过一半的研究包括亚洲/太平洋岛民群体（n=14），其次是黑人群体（n=12）和西班牙裔群体（n=11）。干预的提供模式在不同的研究中有所不同，从在信仰社区举办的研讨会到YouTube上的脱口秀。目标人群包括中年和老年人、照顾者和家庭成员、卫生专业学生和专业人员以及小学生。常见内容包括痴呆症的症状和体征、保护和风险因素以及当地资源。研究结局的评估因研究而异。许多研究报告了痴呆症知识和对痴呆症的态度的改善。在纳入的研究中，干预满意度很高。干预措施的总体质量很低。促进痴呆症知识的教育干预措施正处于早期阶段。现有发表的干预措施显示出足够的可接受性和承诺，促进更好地了解和认识痴呆症的少数群体。需要更多设计良好的随机对照试验。
Certain racial/ethnic minority groups have a higher risk of developing dementia, yet studies have demonstrated that they often have limited knowledge and understanding of this disease. An increasing number of educational and advocacy programs have been developed to promote dementia knowledge. We aimed to assess current evidence and quality regarding educational interventions for promoting dementia knowledge. We searched for intervention studies published in English that focused on educational interventions for promoting dementia knowledge among racial/ethnic minority groups. We identified twenty-five relevant studies through PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Scopus, using tailored search terms. We screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full texts, synthesized relevant evidence, and evaluated the studies’ quality based on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Relevant intervention studies took place in communities, hospitals or clinics, schools, and online. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 21), followed by the UK (n = 3). Over half of the studies included Asian/Pacific Islander groups (n=14), followed by Black groups (n=12), and Hispanic groups (n=11). The intervention delivery mode varied across studies—from workshops hosted in a faith community to talk shows on YouTube. Target populations included middle-aged and older adults, caregivers and family members, health students and professionals, and elementary school students. Common content included symptoms and signs of dementia, protective and risk factors, and local resources. The assessment of study outcomes varied across studies. Improvement in dementia knowledge and attitudes towards dementia was reported in many studies. Among the included studies, intervention satisfaction was high. The overall quality of the interventions was low. Formally evaluated educational interventions promoting dementia knowledge are at an early stage. Existing published interventions showed adequate acceptability and promise in promoting better understanding and awareness of dementia in minority groups. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.009
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chen C;Zissimopoulos JM
通讯作者：
Zissimopoulos JM
痴呆症老年族裔群体获得卫生服务：系统评价。
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Co M;Couch E;Gao Q;Mac-Ginty S;Das-Munshi J;Prina M
通讯作者：
Prina M
DOI：
10.1111/phn.12759
发表时间：
2020-09
期刊：
Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Epps F;Alexander K;Brewster GS;Parker LJ;Chester M;Tomlinson A;Adkins A;Zingg S;Thornton J
通讯作者：
Thornton J
DOI：
10.1177/1471301219885784
发表时间：
2019-11-04
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Guest, M. Aaron;Smith, Macie P.
通讯作者：
Smith, Macie P.
影响因子：
14
作者：
通讯作者：
--