The exploratory behaviour of rats in the hole-board apparatus: is head-dipping a valid measure of neophilia?

The exploratory behaviour of rats in the hole-board apparatus: is head-dipping a valid measure of neophilia?
复制标题

大鼠在孔板设备中的探索性行为:头倾斜了有效的Neophilia量度吗?

DOI:
10.1016/j.beproc.2008.02.019
复制
发表时间:
2008-07
影响因子:
1.3
通讯作者:
Nemes, Christopher
Nemes, Christopher
中科院分区:
生物学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brown, Gillian R.;Nemes, Christopher

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

实验室啮齿动物的探索行为在行为药理学的许多领域都很有趣。然而,如何最好地衡量啮齿动物的探索行为仍然是一个有争议的问题。许多无条件测试,例如开放场地,可能会将一般运动活动与探索混淆。孔板装置似乎避免了这种混淆,因为将头伸入地板上的孔中被认为是受试者对新奇事物(新奇癖)吸引力的有效衡量标准。本研究旨在通过比较成年雄性和雌性Lister头罩大鼠在孔板任务中的表现(a)重复训练和(b)当孔下不存在或存在新物体时,调查是否应将低头视为新恋物癖的有效衡量标准。结果表明,在重复暴露后,低头的次数最初减少,而在令人厌恶的中心区域花费的时间增加。当物体被放置在孔下面时,没有看到低头的变化。这些结果并不是衡量新事物的标准,而是支持这样的假设:低头代表一种逃避反应,随着受试者变得不那么害怕,这种反应会减弱。这些结果与之前反复暴露于其他新环境的研究进行了比较。
The exploratory behaviour of laboratory rodents is of interest within a number of areas of behavioural pharmacology. However, how best to measure exploratory behaviour in rodents remains a contentious issue. Many unconditioned tests, such as the open field, potentially confound general locomotor activity with exploration. The hole-board apparatus appears to avoid this confound, as head-dipping into holes in the floor is assumed to be a valid measure of the subject's attraction towards novelty (neophilia). This study aimed to investigate whether head-dipping should be considered a valid measure of neophilia by comparing performance of adult male and female Lister hooded rats on the hole-board task (a) over repeated sessions and (b) when novel objects were absent or present underneath the holes. The results show that head-dipping initially decreased across repeated exposures, while time spent in the aversive central area increased. No change in head-dipping was seen in response to objects being placed underneath the holes. Rather than being a measure of neophilia, these results support the hypothesis that head-dipping represents an escape response, which declines as the subject becomes less fearful. These results are compared with previous studies of repeated exposure to other novel environments.
DOI: 10.1007/bf00421184
发表时间: 1975-01-01
期刊: PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGIA
影响因子: --
作者:
FILE, SE;WARDILL, AG
通讯作者: WARDILL, AG
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(86)80009-7
发表时间: 1986-01-01
期刊: BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
BIRKE, LIA;SADLER, D
通讯作者: SADLER, D
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00424.2004
发表时间: 2004-11-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Eckel, LA;Moore, SR
通讯作者: Moore, SR
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00294-f
发表时间: 1995-03-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
ABEL, EL
通讯作者: ABEL, EL
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00043-x
发表时间: 2003-04-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Aguilar, R;Gil, L;Tobeña, A
通讯作者: Tobeña, A