Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress.
Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.11.018
复制
发表时间:
2010-02-15
影响因子:
10.6
通讯作者:
Zougkou, Konstantina
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fox, Elaine;Cahill, Shanna;Zougkou, Konstantina
Anxiety vulnerability is associated with biases in attention: a tendency to selectively process negative relative to neutral or positive information. It is not clear whether this bias is: 1) related to the physiological response to stressful events, and 2) causally related to the development of anxiety disorders. We tested the predictive value of both preconscious and conscious attention biases in a prospective study of stress reactivity in a nonclinical sample. One hundred four male participants were assessed at baseline and then again 4 months (n = 82) and 8 months later (n = 70). Salivary cortisol and self-report measures were obtained at the baseline testing session in addition to measures of biased attention. Subsequent emotional reactivity was assessed by means of salivary cortisol and self-reported state-anxiety responses during a laboratory-based stressor (4 months later) as well as during a real-life stressor 8 months later (i.e., examination period). Regression analyses indicated that a preconscious negative processing bias was the best predictor of the cortisol response to stressful events. Importantly, a measure of selective processing provided a better indicator of subsequent emotional reactivity than self-report measures of neuroticism, trait-anxiety, and extraversion. These results suggest that preconscious biases toward negative material play a causal role in heightened anxiety vulnerability. Our results illustrate the potential utility of preconscious biases in attention in providing an early marker of anxiety vulnerability and a potential target for treatment intervention.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1098/rspb.2008.1788
发表时间:
2009-05-22
期刊:
Proceedings. Biological sciences
影响因子:
--
作者:
Fox E;Ridgewell A;Ashwin C
通讯作者:
Ashwin C
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Canli, T;Sivers, H;Gabrieli, JDE
通讯作者:
Gabrieli, JDE
DOI:
10.3758/bf03204507
发表时间:
1993-05-01
期刊:
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS
影响因子:
--
作者:
COHEN, J;MACWHINNEY, B;PROVOST, J
通讯作者:
PROVOST, J
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Beevers, Christopher G.;Gibb, Brandon E.;Miller, Ivan W.
通讯作者:
Miller, Ivan W.
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Dandeneau, Stephane D.;Baldwin, Mark W.;Pruessner, Jens C.
通讯作者:
Pruessner, Jens C.