SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody and neutralization assays reveal the wide range of the humoral immune response to virus.

SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody and neutralization assays reveal the wide range of the humoral immune response to virus.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s42003-021-01649-6
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-29
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Unutmaz D
Unutmaz D
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dogan M;Kozhaya L;Placek L;Gunter C;Yigit M;Hardy R;Plassmeyer M;Coatney P;Lillard K;Bukhari Z;Kleinberg M;Hayes C;Arditi M;Klapper E;Merin N;Liang BT;Gupta R;Alpan O;Unutmaz D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Development of antibody protection during SARS-CoV-2 infection is a pressing question for public health and for vaccine development. We developed highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody and neutralization assays. SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein or Nucleocapsid protein specific IgG antibodies at titers more than 1:100,000 were detectable in all PCR+ subjects (n = 115) and were absent in the negative controls. Other isotype antibodies (IgA, IgG1-4) were also detected. SARS-CoV-2 neutralization was determined in COVID-19 and convalescent plasma at up to 10,000-fold dilution, using Spike protein pseudotyped lentiviruses, which were also blocked by neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Hospitalized patients had up to 3000-fold higher antibody and neutralization titers compared to outpatients or convalescent plasma donors. Interestingly, some COVID-19 patients also possessed NAbs against SARS-CoV Spike protein pseudovirus. Together these results demonstrate the high specificity and sensitivity of our assays, which may impact understanding the quality or duration of the antibody response during COVID-19 and in determining the effectiveness of potential vaccines. Using SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody- and neutralization assays, Dogan et al find that hospitalized individuals show higher IgG antibody responses and higher neutralization titers compared to outpatient or convalescent plasma donors, providing insights into the host humoral response to SARS CoV-2.
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1
发表时间: 2020-04-29
期刊: NATURE MEDICINE
影响因子: 82.9
作者:
Long, Quan-Xin;Liu, Bai-Zhong;Huang, Ai-Long
通讯作者: Huang, Ai-Long
中国使用恢复期血浆作为 COVID-19 免疫疗法的早期经验:已知和未知。
DOI: 10.1111/vox.12968
发表时间: 2020-08-01
期刊: VOX SANGUINIS
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Chen, Binzhen;Xia, Rong
通讯作者: Xia, Rong
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107725
发表时间: 2020-06-02
期刊: CELL REPORTS
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Lv, Huibin;Wu, Nicholas C.;Mok, Chris K. P.
通讯作者: Mok, Chris K. P.
DOI: 10.3390/v12050513
发表时间: 2020-05-01
期刊: VIRUSES-BASEL
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Crawford, Katharine H. D.;Eguia, Rachel;Bloom, Jesse D.
通讯作者: Bloom, Jesse D.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
发表时间: 2020-04-16
期刊: CELL
影响因子: 64.5
作者:
Hoffmann, Markus;Kleine-Weber, Hannah;Poehlmann, Stefan
通讯作者: Poehlmann, Stefan