Functional Settings of Hospital Outdoor Spaces and the Perceptions from Public and Hospital Occupant during COVID-19.
Functional Settings of Hospital Outdoor Spaces and the Perceptions from Public and Hospital Occupant during COVID-19.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/healthcare9111534
复制
发表时间：
2021-11-10
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Long H
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ma M;Adeney M;Long H
医院室外空间对于用户（患者、访客和工作人员）的安全和福祉发挥着重要作用，特别是在大流行期间。然而，由于设计和管理过程，这些空间的实际需求常常被忽视。本研究调查了公众和居住者对室外空间功能设置的看法，并为在 COVID-19 期间（及之后）建设安全、有弹性的医院提供证据。采用了网络内容分析（WCA）和基于网络的调查的多种方法。报告收集自三个主流网站；提取关键词并进行分类，与室外空间的功能设置相关。西南医院的三组占用者（工作人员 n = 47、患者 n = 64、访客 n = 73）参与了调查，以确定他们对这些功能设置的看法。根据657份报告和选定的33个关键词，确定了7个功能设置：健康检查（HC）、隔离观察（QO）、食品和配送（FD）、治愈和恢复（HR）、等待和休息（WR）、交通和停车（TP）、装卸（LU）。对于所有用户来说，HC（4.13）被认为是最期望的功能设置，而FD（2.61）是最不期望的。在满意度方面，大多数用户对HC（3.22）感到满意，而WR（2.16）最不满意。用户在对其群体的期望和满意度方面也表现出显着差异。研究结果表明，受疫情影响，目前的室外空间对于新兴的功能设置并不能完全满足用户的需求。由于角色不同，用户对功能设置的看法存在显着差异。户外空间与用户对新兴功能设置的需求不匹配，导致调查中满意度低、期望高。具有适应性和灵活策略的环境干预措施应适应这些功能设置。管理者、决策者、设计者应该充分认识到用户的差异。
Hospital outdoor spaces play an important role for the safety and well-being of users (patients, visitors, and staff), particularly during a pandemic. However, the actual needs of these spaces are often overlooked due to the design and management process. This study investigates the perceptions of the public and occupants on the functional settings of outdoor spaces, and provides evidence for building a safe and resilient hospital during (and after) COVID-19. A multi-method approach of web content analysis (WCA) and a web-based survey was employed. Reports were collected from three mainstream websites; keywords were extracted and then categorized, pertaining to the functional settings of outdoor spaces. Three groups of occupants from Southwest Hospital (staff n = 47, patients n = 64, visitors n = 73) participated in the survey to identify their perceptions of these functional settings. Based on the 657 reports and 33 keywords selected, 7 functional settings were identified: health check (HC), quarantine and observation (QO), food and delivery (FD), healing and restoration (HR), waiting and rest (WR), transportation and parking (TP), load and unload (LU). From all users, HC (4.13) was thought to be the most expected function setting while FD (2.61) was the least. Regarding the satisfaction level, most users were satisfied with HC (3.22) while WR (2.16) was the least satisfying. The users also showed significant differences regarding expectation and satisfaction pertaining to their groups. The results indicate that the current outdoor space could not fully meet the needs of users, regarding the emerging functional setting, due to the pandemic. Users showed significant different perceptions on the functional setting due to their roles. The mismatch between the outdoor space and the users’ needs on emerging functional settings resulted in low satisfaction and high expectation in the survey. Environmental interventions with adaptive and flexible strategies should be adapted for these functional settings. The differences of users should be fully recognized by administrators, decision-makers, and designers.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.3390/healthcare9070846
发表时间：
2021-07-05
期刊：
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chen T;Rong J;Peng L;Yang J;Cong G;Fang J
通讯作者：
Fang J
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Peterson KHJ;Muckey EJC
通讯作者：
Muckey EJC
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Lee, A. C. K.;Maheswaran, R.
通讯作者：
Maheswaran, R.
DOI：
10.1177/193758671300600308
发表时间：
2013-03-01
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Harris, Debra D.;Detke, Laura A.
通讯作者：
Detke, Laura A.
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Crompton, John L.
通讯作者：
Crompton, John L.