Predicting resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional and longitudinal results.
Predicting resilience during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional and longitudinal results.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0283254
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Sudzina, Frantisek
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bennett, Kate M.;Panzeri, Anna;Derrer-Merk, Elfriede;Butter, Sarah;Hartman, Todd K.;Mason, Liam;McBride, Orla;Murphy, Jamie;Shevlin, Mark;Gibson-Miller, Jilly;Levita, Liat;Martinez, Anton P.;McKay, Ryan;Lloyd, Alex;Stocks, Thomas V. A.;Bottesi, Gioa;Vidotto, Giulo;Bentall, Richard P.;Bertamini, Marco;Lazuras, Lambros;Sudzina, Frantisek
尽管COVID-19大流行影响了部分人的心理健康，但有证据表明，许多人受到的影响要小得多。弹性的生态模型（EMR）可以解释为什么有些人没有弹性，而其他人。在这项研究中，我们通过比较从COVID-19心理研究联盟（C19 PRC）对英国（UK）成年人群代表性样本的纵向研究中收集的英国调查数据和该研究意大利分支的数据来测试EMR。我们首先比较了2020年7月/8月收集的英国第三波研究的数据，以及2020年7月在意大利收集的同等样本和大流行阶段的数据。接下来，使用从2020年3月至2021年4月收集的C19 PRC Waves 1，3和5收集的英国纵向数据，我们确定了具有弹性的人的比例。最后，我们研究哪些因素，从EMR中提取，预测弹性和非弹性的结果。我们发现，72%的英国样本具有弹性，与意大利的研究一致。在横断面逻辑回归模型中，年龄和自尊与复原力显著相关，而死亡焦虑想法、神经质、孤独和与COVID-19相关的创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）症状与非复原力结果显著相关。在纵向UK分析中，在第5波，80%的样品是弹性的。服务的使用，属于更广泛的邻里，自测健康，自尊，开放性，外部产生的死亡焦虑与弹性的结果。相比之下，PTSD症状和孤独感与非弹性结果相关。EMR有效地解释了结果。有一些可变因素可以采取干预措施，以提高今后面对类似挑战时的复原力。
Although the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the psychological wellbeing of some people, there is evidence that many have been much less affected. The Ecological Model of Resilience (EMR) may explain why some individuals are not resilient whilst others are. In this study we test the EMR in a comparison of UK survey data collected from the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) longitudinal study of a representative sample of the United Kingdom (UK) adult population and data from an Italian arm of the study. We first compare data from the third wave of the UK arm of the study, collected in July/August 2020, with data from an equivalent sample and stage of the pandemic in Italy in July 2020. Next, using UK longitudinal data collected from C19PRC Waves 1, 3 and 5, collected between March 2020 and April 2021 we identify the proportion of people who were resilient. Finally, we examine which factors, drawn from the EMR, predict resilient and non-resilient outcomes. We find that the 72% of the UK sample was resilient, in line with the Italian study. In the cross-sectional logistic regression model, age and self-esteem were significantly associated with resilience whilst death anxiety thoughts, neuroticism, loneliness, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms related to COVID-19 were significantly associated with Non-Resilient outcomes. In the longitudinal UK analysis, at Wave 5, 80% of the sample was Resilient. Service use, belonging to wider neighbourhood, self-rated health, self-esteem, openness, and externally generated death anxiety were associated with Resilient outcomes. In contrast, PTSD symptoms and loneliness were associated with Non-Resilient outcomes. The EMR effectively explained the results. There were some variables which are amenable to intervention which could increase resilience in the face of similar future challenges.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2
作者：
Bennett, Kate M.;Reyes-Rodriguez, Maria F.;Soulsby, Laura K.
通讯作者：
Soulsby, Laura K.
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Gagné T;Schoon I;McMunn A;Sacker A
通讯作者：
Sacker A
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Donnellan, Warren J.;Bennett, Kate M.;Soulsby, Laura K.
通讯作者：
Soulsby, Laura K.
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Cloitre, M.;Shevlin, M.;Hyland, P.
通讯作者：
Hyland, P.
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Consoli S;Rossi A;Thompson LY;Volpi C;Mannarini S;Castelnuovo G;Molinari E
通讯作者：
Molinari E