Strategies and automaticity. I: Basic findings and conceptual framework
Strategies and automaticity. I: Basic findings and conceptual framework
复制标题
策略和自动化。
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.20.2.318
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Kramer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Strayer;A. Kramer
通过操纵记忆搜索任务中使用的刺激类的可预测性来评估策略和数据驱动因素对熟练表现的贡献。在实验1中，当一致的映射（CM）和不同的映射（VM）条件被封锁，大的性能差异被观察到，但是，当CM和VM试验混合，性能差异减少。在实验2中，混合训练导致比封闭训练更不熟练的性能。此外，转移条件揭示了一个关键的时间间隔，学习采用和部署差分响应策略。实验3表明，差异反应策略不是刺激特异性的
The contributions of strategic and data-driven factors to skilled performance were evaluated by manipulating the predictability of the class of stimuli used in a memory search task. In Experiment 1, when consistent mapping (CM) and varied mapping (VM) conditions were blocked, large performance differences were observed; however, when CM and VM trials were mixed, performance differences were reduced. In Experiment 2, mixed training led to a less skilled performance than blocked training. Moreover, transfer conditions revealed a critical interval for learning to adopt and deploy differential response strategies. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the differential response strategies were not stimulus specific
老龄化和技能获取：学习表现差异。
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Strayer,DL;Kramer,AF
通讯作者：
Kramer,AF
人类的学习和记忆。
影响因子：
24.8
作者：
Johnson,MK;Hasher,L
通讯作者：
Hasher,L