Post-publication critique at top-ranked journals across scientific disciplines: a cross-sectional assessment of policies and practice.

Post-publication critique at top-ranked journals across scientific disciplines: a cross-sectional assessment of policies and practice.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1098/rsos.220139
复制
发表时间:
2022-08
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Ioannidis, John P. A.
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hardwicke, Tom E.;Thibault, Robert T.;Kosie, Jessica E.;Tzavella, Loukia;Bendixen, Theiss;Handcock, Sarah A.;Koeneke, Vivian E.;Ioannidis, John P. A.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

期刊对批评先前研究的信件、评论和在线评论(出版后评论)施加相当大的控制。我们评估了22个科学学科(N = 330种期刊)中15种顶级期刊的出版后评论相关政策(研究一)和实践(研究二)。有207份(63%)期刊接受了发表后的评论,并经常对长度(中位数1000,四分位数范围(IQR)500-1200字)和提交时间(中位数12,IQR 4-26周)进行限制。最严格的限制是175字和两周;有些政策没有限制。在2018年由接受发表后评论的期刊发表的2066篇随机抽样研究文章中,39篇(1.9%,95%置信区间[1.4,2.6])与至少一项发表后评论有关(总共有58项发表后评论)。在58项发表后的评论中,44项收到了作者的回复,其中41项声称原始结论没有改变。临床医学具有最活跃的发表后评论文化:所有期刊都接受发表后评论,并发表了最多的发表后评论,但也对长度(中位数400,IQR 400-550字)和提交时间(中位数4,IQR 4-6周)施加了最严格的限制。我们的研究结果表明,排名靠前的学术期刊往往对出版后评论的培养、记录和传播构成严重障碍。
Journals exert considerable control over letters, commentaries and online comments that criticize prior research (post-publication critique). We assessed policies (Study One) and practice (Study Two) related to post-publication critique at 15 top-ranked journals in each of 22 scientific disciplines (N = 330 journals). Two-hundred and seven (63%) journals accepted post-publication critique and often imposed limits on length (median 1000, interquartile range (IQR) 500–1200 words) and time-to-submit (median 12, IQR 4–26 weeks). The most restrictive limits were 175 words and two weeks; some policies imposed no limits. Of 2066 randomly sampled research articles published in 2018 by journals accepting post-publication critique, 39 (1.9%, 95% confidence interval [1.4, 2.6]) were linked to at least one post-publication critique (there were 58 post-publication critiques in total). Of the 58 post-publication critiques, 44 received an author reply, of which 41 asserted that original conclusions were unchanged. Clinical Medicine had the most active culture of post-publication critique: all journals accepted post-publication critique and published the most post-publication critique overall, but also imposed the strictest limits on length (median 400, IQR 400–550 words) and time-to-submit (median 4, IQR 4–6 weeks). Our findings suggest that top-ranked academic journals often pose serious barriers to the cultivation, documentation and dissemination of post-publication critique.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
发表时间: 2005-08-01
期刊: PLOS MEDICINE
影响因子: 15.8
作者:
Ioannidis, JPA
通讯作者: Ioannidis, JPA
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001107
发表时间: 2021-03
期刊: PLoS biology
影响因子: 9.8
作者:
Serghiou S;Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG;Boyack KW;Riedel N;Wallach JD;Ioannidis JPA
通讯作者: Ioannidis JPA
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c3926
发表时间: 2010-08-10
影响因子: --
作者:
Gotzsche, Peter C.;Delamothe, Tony;Lundh, Andreas
通讯作者: Lundh, Andreas
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031219-041104
发表时间: 2020-01-01
期刊: ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 7, 2020
影响因子: --
作者:
Hardwicke, Tom E.;Serghiou, Stylianos;Ioannidis, John P. A.
通讯作者: Ioannidis, John P. A.
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190806
发表时间: 2020-02-19
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Hardwicke, Tom E.;Wallach, Joshua D.;Ioannidis, John P. A.
通讯作者: Ioannidis, John P. A.