Best practice guidelines for reporting spoken discourse in aphasia and neurogenic communication disorders
Best practice guidelines for reporting spoken discourse in aphasia and neurogenic communication disorders
复制标题
报告失语症和神经源性沟通障碍患者言语的最佳实践指南
作者：
B. Stark;Lucy Bryant;C. Themistocleous;D. den Ouden;Angela C. Roberts
摘要 背景 口语是一种基本的沟通形式，但患有失语症和其他神经源性沟通障碍的人经常会受到干扰。由此可见，话语分析对于理解这些人群的语言、语言障碍和语言恢复非常重要。作为一个高度跨学科的领域，话语分析将受益于一套指南（最佳实践），这些指南有助于简化针对神经源性沟通障碍人群的特定话语的报告和讨论。这将通过提高可重复性、允许荟萃分析和支持临床实践中的实施来提高正在进行的研究的整体质量。目标 为在失语症中使用口语话语分析的研究建立明确的报告指南。方法和程序 使用电子德尔菲调查方法。我们使用布尔搜索标准和作者共识确定了失语症和神经源性沟通障碍专家，然后邀请这些人参加一项在线三轮调查。三轮测试于 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 6 月期间进行。在每一轮中，参与者被要求按照 1（“完全不需要”）到 5（“非常需要”）的等级对项目的必要性进行排序。参与者被指示根据该项目是否有必要为制定最低报告指南进行评分。只有在前一轮做出回应的参与者才会被邀请参加后续轮次。符合评级高于“必要”的预定共识标准的项目将被提交到后续的每一轮。根据从参与者收集的定性信息，每轮都会添加新项目。结果与结果 在第 3 轮中被≥ 70% 的参与者评为“高度必要”或“极其必要”的项目被视为“有必要”在研究中报告，而在第 3 轮中被评为 < 70% 的项目被视为“建议”在研究中报告。第三轮之后，有 16 项被认为“有必要”在研究中报告。另外还有五项被“推荐”。结论 该领域的领先研究人员一致认为，20 个报告项目是“必要”或“推荐”的，作为所有口语话语研究中报告的最低信息。这些项目包括有关采样、转录和分析的信息。遵守严格制定的报告指南对于提高该领域研究的整体质量和可复制性非常重要。我们已将当前建议存档在开放科学框架上，建议的更新也将位于该框架中 (https://osf.io/y48n9/)。
ABSTRACT Background Spoken discourse is a fundamental form of communication, yet often disrupted in persons with aphasia and other neurogenic communication disorders. It follows that discourse analysis is important for understanding language, its impairments, and language recovery in these populations. Being a highly interdisciplinary field, discourse analysis would benefit from a set of guidelines (best practices) that help streamline reporting and discussion of discourse specific to populations with neurogenic communication disorders. This would enhance the overall quality of ongoing research by improving replicability, allowing meta-analysis, and supporting implementation in clinical practice. Aims To establish clear reporting guidelines for studies that use spoken discourse analysis in aphasia. Methods & Procedures An e-Delphi survey methodology was used. We identified aphasia and neurogenic communication disorder experts using Boolean search criteria and author consensus, then invited these individuals to participate in an online, three-round survey. The three rounds took place between November 2020 and June 2021. In each round, participants were asked to rank necessity of items on a scale of 1 (“not at all necessary”) to 5 (“extremely necessary”). Participants were instructed to rate based on whether the item was necessary to inform the creation of a minimum reporting guideline. Only participants who responded in the prior round were invited to participate in subsequent rounds. Items that met predetermined consensus criteria for ratings greater than “necessary” were brought forward to each subsequent round. New items were added to each round based on qualitative information collected from participants. Outcomes & Results Items that were rated by ≥ 70% of the participants as “highly necessary” or “extremely necessary” in Round 3 were those deemed as “necessary” to be reported in research, whereas items rated < 70% in Round 3 were deemed as “recommended” to be reported in research. Following Round 3, 16 items were deemed “necessary” to report in research. A further five items were “recommended”. Conclusions Consensus by leading researchers in the field established that 20 reporting items were “necessary” or “recommended” as the minimum information reported across all spoken discourse studies. These items included information about sampling, transcription, and analysis. Adherence to rigorously developed reporting guidelines is important for improving the overall quality and replicability of research in the field. We have archived the current recommendations on the Open Science Framework, which is where updates to the recommendations will also be located (https://osf.io/y48n9/).
失语症的口语评估和分析：当前实践的国际调查。
DOI：
10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00708
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
影响因子：
--
作者：
Stark,BrielleC;Dutta,Manaswita;Murray,LauraL;Fromm,Davida;Bryant,Lucy;Harmon,TysonG;Ramage,AmyE;Roberts,AngelaC
通讯作者：
Roberts,AngelaC
进行虚拟研究，特别考虑与失语症患者一起工作。
DOI：
10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00392
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
影响因子：
--
作者：
Doub,Ashleigh;Hittson,Anne;Stark,BrielleC
通讯作者：
Stark,BrielleC
失语症和年龄匹配成人的三种话语诱发方法的比较：对语言评估和结果的影响。
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Stark,BrielleC
通讯作者：
Stark,BrielleC