Embodied rationality: a framework of human action in water infrastructure governance
Embodied rationality: a framework of human action in water infrastructure governance
复制标题
体现理性：水基础设施治理中人类行动的框架
DOI：
10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101170
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
C. Spackman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Marisa K Manheim;C. Spackman
根据具体的理性，“理性”的决定产生了人类-自然的适应性结果。负担能力-直接感知的，环境的行为机会-本质上是共同产生的。品尝是学习消费者废水再利用犹豫的主观，身体基础的机会。（品尝）最好与合作治理相结合。可持续理性已经应用于可持续发展，而且有很多扩展的机会。批评者断言，对人类行为的普遍假设限制了基础设施适应的途径。非理性为学者和实践者提供了一个替代框架，将理性决策描述为为那些为人类-自然系统产生适应性结果的决策。通过强调身体在感知中的作用，具身理性在关系主义和个人主义的人性观之间架起了一座桥梁。它还有助于将基础设施理论化为固有的共同构建。基于体现理性的实践可以增加规划中的知识多元化，并帮助基础设施管理人员避免代价高昂的错误。水资源管理者激活体现理性时，提供品尝，让消费者在审议有关直接饮用水再利用的废水。因此，可持续理性为治理有争议的可持续性转型提供了一个特别相关的及时框架。
HighlightsAccording to embodied rationality,‘rational’decisions produce adaptive outcomes for human-nature.Affordances—directly perceivable, environmental opportunities for behavior—are inherently co-produced.Tastings are opportunities to learn the subjective, bodily basis of consumer wastewater reuse hesitancy.Embodied methods (tastings) are best paired with collaborative governance.Embodied rationality is already applied in sustainability, and has many opportunities for extension.Critics assert that prevailing assumptions of human behavior limit pathways for infrastructure adaptations. Embodied rationality offers scholars and practitioners an alternative framework that characterizes rational decisions as those producing adaptive outcomes for human–nature systems. By emphasizing the body’s role in perception, embodied rationality provides a bridge between relational and individualistic conceptions of human–nature. It also facilitates theorizing infrastructures as inherently co-constructed. Practices based on embodied rationality can increase knowledge pluralism in planning and help infrastructure managers avoid costly mistakes. Water managers activate embodied rationality when offering tastings to engage consumers in deliberations about the direct potable reuse of wastewater. Embodied rationality, therefore, offers a timely framework of particular relevance to the governance of contested sustainability transitions.
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1076
发表时间：
1999-08-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Bhalla, M;Proffitt, DR
通讯作者：
Proffitt, DR
影响因子：
27.6
作者：
Caniglia, Guido;Luederitz, C.;Lang, D. J.
通讯作者：
Lang, D. J.
影响因子：
10.3
作者：
Hondula, David M;Sabo, John L;Quay, Ray;Chester, Mikhail;Georgescu, Matei;Grimm, Nancy B;Harlan, Sharon L;Middel, Ariane;Porter, Sarah;Redman, Charles L
通讯作者：
Redman, Charles L