A survey of protocols from 54 infant and toddler neuroimaging research labs.
A survey of protocols from 54 infant and toddler neuroimaging research labs.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101060
复制
发表时间:
2022-04
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Thomason ME
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hendrix CL;Thomason ME
Infant and toddler MRI enables unprecedented insight into the developing brain. However, consensus about optimal data collection practices is lacking, which slows growth of the field and impedes replication efforts. The goal of this study was to collect systematic data across a large number of infant/toddler research laboratories to better understand preferred practices. Survey data addressed MRI acquisition strategies, scan success rates, visit preparations, scanning protocols, accommodations for families, study design, and policies regarding incidental findings. Respondents had on average 8 years’ experience in early life neuroimaging and represented more than fifty research laboratories. Areas of consensus across labs included higher success rates among newborns compared to older infants or toddlers, high rates of data loss across age groups, endorsement of multiple layers of hearing protection, and age-specific scan preparation and participant accommodation. Researchers remain divided on decisions in longitudinal study design and practices regarding incidental findings. This study summarizes practices honed over years of work by a large collection of scientists, which may serve as an important resource for those new to the field. The ability to reference data about best practices facilitates future harmonization, data sharing, and reproducibility, all of which advance this important frontier in developmental science. There is high inter-lab variability in success rates for infant/toddler MRI scans. Infant/toddler MRI scanning would benefit from unique institutional accommodations. At least 3 layers of hearing protection are used by the majority of labs. Experts report heterogeneous recommendations regarding incidental findings.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
15.1
作者:
Carney O;Hughes E;Tusor N;Dimitrova R;Arulkumaran S;Baruteau KP;Collado AE;Cordero-Grande L;Chew A;Falconer S;Allsop JM;Rueckert D;Hajnal J;Edwards AD;Rutherford M
通讯作者:
Rutherford M
DOI:
10.1053/j.nainr.2008.10.010
发表时间:
2008-12-01
期刊:
NEWBORN AND INFANT NURSING REVIEWS
影响因子:
--
作者:
Graven, Stanley N.;Browne, Joy V.
通讯作者:
Browne, Joy V.
DOI:
10.1177/1073858416635986
发表时间:
2017-04
期刊:
The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry
影响因子:
--
作者:
Gao W;Lin W;Grewen K;Gilmore JH
通讯作者:
Gilmore JH
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Grewen K;Salzwedel AP;Gao W
通讯作者:
Gao W
DOI:
10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.11.003
发表时间:
2021-04
期刊:
Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging
影响因子:
--
作者:
Hendrix CL;Dilks DD;McKenna BG;Dunlop AL;Corwin EJ;Brennan PA
通讯作者:
Brennan PA