Metabolic responses to sulfur dioxide in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): photosynthetic tissues and berries.

Metabolic responses to sulfur dioxide in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): photosynthetic tissues and berries.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpls.2015.00060
复制
发表时间:
2015
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Foyer CH
Foyer CH
中科院分区:
生物学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Considine MJ;Foyer CH

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

植物中硫代谢的研究历来是在工业污染的背景下进行的。硫污染问题的解决导致许多土壤缺硫。关键问题仍然是关于不同的植物器官如何处理反应性和潜在的有毒硫代谢物。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了二氧化硫/亚硫酸盐同化葡萄浆果的基因表达和品质性状,功能仍然显着的食品工业。我们认为,亚硫酸盐的内在代谢及其后果的水果生物学和采后生理,比较不同的反应,在水果和叶子。我们还强调了被认为是“周围”环境或工业暴露于SO2的不一致性。我们讨论这些调查结果的持续威胁,政府间机构将撤销该行业的豁免,全球范围内禁止使用二氧化硫保存新鲜食品的鲜食葡萄产业。对水果的转录组分析研究表明,SO2熏蒸对参与支持与客户满意度相关的性状的过程的基因编码组分的表达的影响可能会产生附加值,特别是在鲜食葡萄中,SO2熏蒸可能会持续数月。
Research on sulfur metabolism in plants has historically been undertaken within the context of industrial pollution. Resolution of the problem of sulfur pollution has led to sulfur deficiency in many soils. Key questions remain concerning how different plant organs deal with reactive and potentially toxic sulfur metabolites. In this review, we discuss sulfur dioxide/sulfite assimilation in grape berries in relation to gene expression and quality traits, features that remain significant to the food industry. We consider the intrinsic metabolism of sulfite and its consequences for fruit biology and postharvest physiology, comparing the different responses in fruit and leaves. We also highlight inconsistencies in what is considered the “ambient” environmental or industrial exposures to SO2. We discuss these findings in relation to the persistent threat to the table grape industry that intergovernmental agencies will revoke the industry’s exemption to the worldwide ban on the use of SO2 for preservation of fresh foods. Transcriptome profiling studies on fruit suggest that added value may accrue from effects of SO2 fumigation on the expression of genes encoding components involved in processes that underpin traits related to customer satisfaction, particularly in table grapes, where SO2 fumigation may extend for several months.
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh094
发表时间: 2004-04-01
影响因子: 6.9
作者:
Hartmann, T;Hönicke, P;Kopriva, S
通讯作者: Kopriva, S
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04331.x
发表时间: 2012-12-01
期刊: NEW PHYTOLOGIST
影响因子: 9.4
作者:
Hamisch, Domenica;Randewig, Doerte;Haensch, Robert
通讯作者: Haensch, Robert
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-165
发表时间: 2011-11-18
期刊: BMC plant biology
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Guillaumie S;Fouquet R;Kappel C;Camps C;Terrier N;Moncomble D;Dunlevy JD;Davies C;Boss PK;Delrot S
通讯作者: Delrot S
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0808204105
发表时间: 2008-10-21
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Dominguez-Solis, Jose R.;He, Zengyong;Luan, Sheng
通讯作者: Luan, Sheng
DOI: 10.1104/pp.78.3.582
发表时间: 1985-01-01
期刊: PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: 7.4
作者:
GAYLER, KR;SYKES, GE
通讯作者: SYKES, GE