Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines.
Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines.
复制标题
进行和报告研究的透明度：对学术学科的作者，审阅者和编辑的调查。
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0270054
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
人们呼吁提高开展和报告研究的透明度，改善工作环境，防止有害的研究做法。为了评估对这些主题的态度和做法，我们向作者、审稿人和编辑发送了一份调查。我们收到了74，749封邮件中的3，659封（4.9%）回复。我们发现，作者，审稿人和编辑的态度之间没有显着差异进行和报告研究的透明度，或对他们的看法的工作氛围。所有群体都认为不当的作者是最普遍的有害研究实践，而捏造，伪造，剽窃和不引用先前的相关研究，被认为是编辑比作者或审稿人更普遍。总体而言，20%的受访者承认为了数量而牺牲了出版物的质量，14%的受访者表示资助者干预了他们的研究设计或报告。虽然调查的答复者来自126个不同的国家，但由于调查的总体答复率较低，我们的结果不一定具有普遍性。然而，结果表明，需要所有利益攸关方更多地参与，以使实际做法与目前的建议保持一致。
Calls have been made for improving transparency in conducting and reporting research, improving work climates, and preventing detrimental research practices. To assess attitudes and practices regarding these topics, we sent a survey to authors, reviewers, and editors. We received 3,659 (4.9%) responses out of 74,749 delivered emails. We found no significant differences between authors’, reviewers’, and editors’ attitudes towards transparency in conducting and reporting research, or towards their perceptions of work climates. Undeserved authorship was perceived by all groups as the most prevalent detrimental research practice, while fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and not citing prior relevant research, were seen as more prevalent by editors than authors or reviewers. Overall, 20% of respondents admitted sacrificing the quality of their publications for quantity, and 14% reported that funders interfered in their study design or reporting. While survey respondents came from 126 different countries, due to the survey’s overall low response rate our results might not necessarily be generalizable. Nevertheless, results indicate that greater involvement of all stakeholders is needed to align actual practices with current recommendations.
登录
查看更多内容
科学标准。促进开放的研究文化。
DOI：
10.1126/science.aab2374
发表时间：
2015-06-26
期刊：
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Nosek BA;Alter G;Banks GC;Borsboom D;Bowman SD;Breckler SJ;Buck S;Chambers CD;Chin G;Christensen G;Contestabile M;Dafoe A;Eich E;Freese J;Glennerster R;Goroff D;Green DP;Hesse B;Humphreys M;Ishiyama J;Karlan D;Kraut A;Lupia A;Mabry P;Madon TA;Malhotra N;Mayo-Wilson E;McNutt M;Miguel E;Paluck EL;Simonsohn U;Soderberg C;Spellman BA;Turitto J;VandenBos G;Vazire S;Wagenmakers EJ;Wilson R;Yarkoni T
通讯作者：
Yarkoni T
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
Moher, David;Bouter, Lex;Dirnagl, Ulrich
通讯作者：
Dirnagl, Ulrich
影响因子：
15.8
作者：
Ioannidis, JPA
通讯作者：
Ioannidis, JPA
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Fuller, Thomas;Pearson, Mark;Anderson, Rob
通讯作者：
Anderson, Rob
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Patience, Gregory S.;Galli, Federico;Boffito, Daria C.
通讯作者：
Boffito, Daria C.