Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity.

Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007
复制
发表时间:
2014-09
期刊:
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Neubauer, Aljoscha C.
Neubauer, Aljoscha C.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Benedek, Mathias;Jauk, Emanuel;Sommer, Markus;Arendasy, Martin;Neubauer, Aljoscha C.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

智力和创造力被认为是相关的结构,这表明它们有着共同的认知基础。本研究评估了三种特定的执行能力-更新,转移和抑制-并检查了它们与流体智力和创造力的共同和差异关系(即,发散性思维能力)内的潜变量模型方法。此外,还测试了流体智力和创造力的相关性是否可以通过共同的行政参与来解释。正如预期的那样,流体智力强烈预测更新,而不是通过转移或抑制。创造力的预测更新和抑制,但不是由转移。此外,更新(和个性因素的开放性)被发现可以解释智力和创造力之间的共享方差的相关部分。研究结果提供了直接支持的行政参与创造性思维,并进一步阐明智力和创造力之间的功能关系。与执行功能、智力和创造力相关的潜变量分析智力是通过更新能力预测的,而不是通过抑制或转移能力预测的。更新和抑制对创造力有预测作用,但对转换能力没有预测作用。更新解释了智力-创造力关系的一个相关部分。
Intelligence and creativity are known to be correlated constructs suggesting that they share a common cognitive basis. The present study assessed three specific executive abilities – updating, shifting, and inhibition – and examined their common and differential relations to fluid intelligence and creativity (i.e., divergent thinking ability) within a latent variable model approach. Additionally, it was tested whether the correlation of fluid intelligence and creativity can be explained by a common executive involvement. As expected, fluid intelligence was strongly predicted by updating, but not by shifting or inhibition. Creativity was predicted by updating and inhibition, but not by shifting. Moreover, updating (and the personality factor openness) was found to explain a relevant part of the shared variance between intelligence and creativity. The findings provide direct support for the executive involvement in creative thought and shed further light on the functional relationship between intelligence and creativity. Latent variable analysis relating executive functions, intelligence and creativity Intelligence is predicted by updating, but not inhibition or shifting ability. Creativity is predicted by updating and inhibition, but not shifting ability. Updating explains a relevant part of the intelligence–creativity relationship.
DOI: 10.1037/a0029171
发表时间: 2012-11-01
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Beaty, Roger E.;Silvia, Paul J.
通讯作者: Silvia, Paul J.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021
发表时间: 2014-03
期刊: NeuroImage
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Benedek M;Jauk E;Fink A;Koschutnig K;Reishofer G;Ebner F;Neubauer AC
通讯作者: Neubauer AC
DOI: 10.1037/a0033644
发表时间: 2013-11-01
期刊: Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts
影响因子: --
作者:
Benedek M;Mühlmann C;Jauk E;Neubauer AC
通讯作者: Neubauer AC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.010
发表时间: 2014-04
期刊: NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Benedek, Mathias;Schickel, Rainer J.;Jauk, Emanuel;Fink, Andreas;Neubauer, Aljoscha C.
通讯作者: Neubauer, Aljoscha C.
DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.1999.2276
发表时间: 2000-06-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Ashton, MC;Lee, K;Jang, KL
通讯作者: Jang, KL