Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes.
Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fsoc.2022.957246
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Grigorovich, Alisa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berridge, Clara;Grigorovich, Alisa
关键词：
尽管老年人在数字上被边缘化，并被定位为监控技术和风险缓解的目标，但人工智能或算法危害的学术研究并没有集中在老年人身上。在这篇翻译论文中，我们将老年学与关键残疾，种族和女权主义研究中的信息和数据技术奖学金进行了对话，并探讨了美国和加拿大养老院内老年人和护理人员监控技术的算法危害。我们首先要确定新兴学术和关于“数字年龄歧视”的公共话语的局限性，这些学术和公共话语致力于在人工智能或机器学习中纳入和代表老年人，而牺牲了更紧迫的问题。在新型冠状病毒疫情背景下，我们专注于养老院对这些技术的投资，借鉴信息和数据技术方面的关键学术成果，深入了解当监控技术被定位为解决方案时，老年歧视如何与居民和工人所经历的系统性伤害有关。然后，我们提出了生成途径，并指出了各种可能的研究议程，这些研究议程可以阐明新兴的算法危害及其在养老院中的推动力。在批判性老年学的传统中，我们的项目是将老年学和年龄研究的见解应用于边缘化群体的自动化和算法决策系统的更广泛工作，并将这项工作应用于老年学。本文阐述了从关键的种族，残疾和女权主义研究的重要见解的具体方式，帮助我们画出的权力，年龄歧视作为一种修辞和分析工具。我们证明了为什么这种参与是必要的，以实现老年学的能力，有助于及时讨论算法的危害，并提升年龄歧视的问题，在涉及社会和经济正义的领域进行认真的参与。我们开始从养老院开始，因为它们是一个未被充分研究的，但具有社会意义的和及时的环境，可以了解算法的危害。我们希望这将有助于更广泛的努力，以了解和纠正跨部门和边缘化集体的伤害。
Ageism has not been centered in scholarship on AI or algorithmic harms despite the ways in which older adults are both digitally marginalized and positioned as targets for surveillance technology and risk mitigation. In this translation paper, we put gerontology into conversation with scholarship on information and data technologies within critical disability, race, and feminist studies and explore algorithmic harms of surveillance technologies on older adults and care workers within nursing homes in the United States and Canada. We start by identifying the limitations of emerging scholarship and public discourse on “digital ageism” that is occupied with the inclusion and representation of older adults in AI or machine learning at the expense of more pressing questions. Focusing on the investment in these technologies in the context of COVID-19 in nursing homes, we draw from critical scholarship on information and data technologies to deeply understand how ageism is implicated in the systemic harms experienced by residents and workers when surveillance technologies are positioned as solutions. We then suggest generative pathways and point to various possible research agendas that could illuminate emergent algorithmic harms and their animating force within nursing homes. In the tradition of critical gerontology, ours is a project of bringing insights from gerontology and age studies to bear on broader work on automation and algorithmic decision-making systems for marginalized groups, and to bring that work to bear on gerontology. This paper illustrates specific ways in which important insights from critical race, disability and feminist studies helps us draw out the power of ageism as a rhetorical and analytical tool. We demonstrate why such engagement is necessary to realize gerontology's capacity to contribute to timely discourse on algorithmic harms and to elevate the issue of ageism for serious engagement across fields concerned with social and economic justice. We begin with nursing homes because they are an understudied, yet socially significant and timely setting in which to understand algorithmic harms. We hope this will contribute to broader efforts to understand and redress harms across sectors and marginalized collectives.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Berridge, Clara
通讯作者：
Berridge, Clara
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-48342-9_5
发表时间：
2017-01-01
期刊：
UNDER OBSERVATION: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN EHEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE
影响因子：
--
作者：
Berridge, Clara
通讯作者：
Berridge, Clara
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
Bourbonnais, Anne;Rousseau, Jacqueline;Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
通讯作者：
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
BUTLER, RN
通讯作者：
BUTLER, RN
DOI：
10.1177/1533317520976720
发表时间：
2020-01-01
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Borges-Machado, Flavia;Barros, Duarte;Carvalho, Joana
通讯作者：
Carvalho, Joana