Students' technological ambivalence toward online proctoring and the need for responsible use of educational technologies

Students' technological ambivalence toward online proctoring and the need for responsible use of educational technologies
复制标题

学生对在线监考的技术矛盾心理以及负责任地使用教育技术的必要性

DOI:
10.1002/jee.20504
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Hingle, Ashish
Hingle, Ashish
中科院分区:
工程技术2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Johri, Aditya;Hingle, Ashish

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

背景COVID-19导致高等教育机构(HEI)在教学中使用技术的数量空前增加,包括工程、计算和技术课程。鉴于情况的紧迫性,技术的实施往往是短期的,而不是长期的view.PurposeIn这项研究中,我们调查学生的看法使用基于视频的监控(VbM)监考考试,以更好地评估其对学生的影响。我们利用技术矛盾作为一个框架透镜来分析学生的经验和使用VbM的看法,并得出负责任地使用教育technology.MethodQualitative数据收集从学生使用焦点小组访谈和讨论板作业和归纳分析,以了解学生的经验。作为一个持续的负面看法,学生对使用VBM,以及他们的机构和教师。学生接受了技术的必然性,但不相信VBM的好处超过其risks.ConclusionsAs教师使用的教育技术,本质上是由用户数据和算法,是不透明的驱动,这是必要的,他们是注意负责任地使用技术。为了教育未来的工程师谁是伦理和道德上负责,工程教育工作者和工程机构需要在自己的实践中表现出这种行为,从他们使用的教育技术开始。
BackgroundCOVID‐19 has led to an unprecedented increase in the use of technology for teaching and learning in higher education institutions (HEIs), including in engineering, computing, and technology programs. Given the urgency of the situation, technologies were often implemented with a short‐term rather than long‐term view.PurposeIn this study, we investigate students' perceptions of the use of video‐based monitoring (VbM) for proctoring exams to better assess its impact on students. We leverage technological ambivalence as a framing lens to analyze students' experiences and perceptions of using VbM and draw implications for responsible use of educational technology.MethodQualitative data were collected from students using focus group interviews and discussion board assignments and analyzed inductively to understand students' experiences.FindingsWe present a framework of how a technological shift of existing practice triggered ambivalence that manifested itself as a sustained negative outlook among students regarding the use of VbM, as well as their institution and instructors. Students accepted the inevitability of the technology but were unconvinced that the benefits of VbM outweighed its risks.ConclusionsAs instructors use educational technologies that are inherently driven by user data and algorithms that are not transparent, it is imperative that they are attentive to the responsible use of technology. To educate future engineers who are ethically and morally responsible, engineering educators and engineering institutions need to exhibit that behavior in their own practices, starting with their use of educational technologies.
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.8.1.23
发表时间: 1997-01-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Hart, P;Saunders, C
通讯作者: Saunders, C
赛风网站
DOI: --
发表时间: --
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: --
发表时间: 2022
影响因子: 2.2
作者:
A. Johri
通讯作者: A. Johri
高等教育中的学习分析工具:机构承诺和个人行动交叉点的采用
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
期刊: Review of higher education (Print)
影响因子: --
作者:
Carrie Klein;Jaime Lester;H. Rangwala;A. Johri
通讯作者: A. Johri
DOI: --
发表时间: 1999
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Stacy Wolski;S. Jackson
通讯作者: S. Jackson