A Framework and Databases for Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems

A Framework and Databases for Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
复制标题

衡量创业生态系统的框架和数据库

DOI:
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104398
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Joshi, A.
Joshi, A.
中科院分区:
管理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Johnson, E.;Hemmatian, I.;Lanahan, L.;Joshi, A.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

关于创业生态系统概念的学术文献在过去五年里急剧增加。兴趣的激增也提高了对捕捉生态系统组成要素之间动态关系的复杂性的强有力的经验衡量标准的需求。我们提供了一个衡量框架,将企业家、公司、政府机构和研究机构之间的协作关系置于生态系统概念的中心。我们进一步强调了联邦政府在塑造这些关系中的四个角色,即催化剂、协调者、证明者和客户。尽管这些企业-政府互动具有核心重要性,但令人惊讶的是,关于将它们系统和可靠地纳入生态系统健康衡量标准的适当方法和适当数据的研究少之又少。我们的研究旨在解决文献中的这一空白,首先开发一个衡量创业生态系统的概念框架,然后描述一系列附带的数据库,这些数据库提供关于公司及其与政府组织、加速器和研究机构的关系的丰富和详细的信息。我们方法的一个主要优势是,所有基础数据库都来自透明披露和定期更新的非机密、可公开获得的来源。这极大地扩大了潜在的学者、管理人员和政策制定者社区,他们可以独立使用这些数据库来测试与创新和创业相关的理论、决策和制定政策。
Scholarly literature on the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems has increased sharply over the past five years. The surge in interest has also heightened the demand for robust empirical measures that capture the complexity of dynamic relationships among ecosystem constituents. We offer a framework for measurement that places collaborative relationships among entrepreneurs, firms, government agencies, and research institutions at the center of the ecosystem concept. We further emphasize the four roles of the federal government as acatalyst, coordinator, certifier, andcustomerin shaping these relationships. Despite the central importance of these firm-government interactions, there is surprisingly little research on suitable methodologies and appropriate data for systematically and reliably incorporating them into measures of ecosystem health. Our study aims to address this gap in the literature by first developing a conceptual framework for measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems and then describing an array of accompanying databases that provide rich and detailed information on firms and their relationships with government organizations, accelerators, and research institutions. A major advantage of our approach is that all the underlying databases are drawn from non-confidential, publicly available sources that are transparently disclosed and regularly updated. This greatly expands the potential community of scholars, managers, and policymakers that may independently use these databases to test theories, make decisions, and formulate policies related to innovation and entrepreneurship.
DOI: --
发表时间: --
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Marshall
通讯作者: A. Marshall
反击全球化的怀疑论者:侨民如何影响少数族裔企业家公司的国际化偏好
DOI: 10.1002/gsj.1359
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Todd M. Inouye;Amol M. Joshi;Iman Hemmatian;Jeffrey A. Robinson
通讯作者: Jeffrey A. Robinson
不当处罚、期望溢价:更多认证实际上意味着什么?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Organization science (Providence, R.I.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Lauren Lanahan;D. Armanios;Amol M. Joshi
通讯作者: Amol M. Joshi
行为创新:家庭领域用户创新的试点研究和大数据分析新方法
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
C. V. Hippel;Andrew Cann
通讯作者: Andrew Cann
众筹和区域创业投资:CrowdB​​erkeley 数据库的应用
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.008
发表时间: 2017
期刊: Research Policy
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Yu, Sandy;Johnson, Scott;Lai, Chiayu;Cricelli, Antonio;Fleming, Lee
通讯作者: Fleming, Lee