Is Positive Always Positive? The Effects of Precrisis Media Coverage on Rumor Refutation Effectiveness in Social Media
Is Positive Always Positive? The Effects of Precrisis Media Coverage on Rumor Refutation Effectiveness in Social Media
复制标题
积极的总是积极的吗?
DOI:
10.1080/10919392.2015.990785
复制
发表时间:
2015-01
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Song Peijian
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang Quansheng;Song Peijian
While providing an unparalleled platform to enable consumers to share information easily with others, social media also threatens organizational control of information and increases risk when organizations become the focus of harmful rumors. Denials, or statements refuting rumors, are able to reduce consumers’ belief in and intention to share rumors. However, the evidence of their effectiveness is not uniformly supportive. Although scholars have highlighted the importance of identifying the moderators for rumor refutation effectiveness, media, as one of the essential infomediaries to shape consumers’ perceptions about firms, was largely overlooked in literatures. This study, therefore, explores the extent to which effective rumor refutation is a function of precrisis media coverage. Drawing on the literature in expectancy violation and media influences on social perceptions, we assessed the influence of precrisis media coverage on rumor refutation effectiveness in a scenario-based experiment. The findings suggest that the tenor of media coverage moderates the relationship between the quality of refutation arguments and refutation effectiveness. When the media coverage is positive, high-quality refutation arguments will not result in significant lower levels of belief in, and intentions to share, the rumor than low-quality arguments. This study contributes a clearer understanding of rumor refutation effectiveness, as well as furnishing important insights regarding the value of media coverage and reputation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
10.4
作者:
James D. Westphal;Sun Hyun Park;Michael L. McDonald;Mathew L. A. Hayward
通讯作者:
James D. Westphal;Sun Hyun Park;Michael L. McDonald;Mathew L. A. Hayward
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1969
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
K. Weick
通讯作者:
K. Weick
影响因子:
10.4
作者:
Stefan Jonsson;H. Greve;Takako Fujiwara-Greve
通讯作者:
Stefan Jonsson;H. Greve;Takako Fujiwara-Greve
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
M. Alvesson
通讯作者:
M. Alvesson
影响因子:
8
作者:
Rafael la Porta
通讯作者:
Rafael la Porta