Conclusion: Governing Under the Condition of Complexity

Conclusion: Governing Under the Condition of Complexity
复制标题

结论:复杂条件下的治理

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_21
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
Configurations, Dynamics and Mechanisms of Multilevel Governance
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Arthur
Arthur
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Arthur

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本章从我们对多级治理的研究中得出结论。报告将从各级政府与行政部门、行政部门与议会的关系和政策部门之间的多重联系所造成的体制制约入手,讨论行为者处理这些制约的各种方式。一些旨在避免冲突或否决权的战略对有效性或民主合法性产生了负面影响,而另一些战略则利用机构的多样性和动态,有助于减少这些后果。因此,治理的复杂性以一种特定的方式限制和促进政策制定,这是对自由和民主政府的期望。处理这一困境需要灵活的结构和战略行动者。MLG由此产生的动态可能会破坏或恢复权力平衡。虽然比较研究发现了各种模式的协调和决策的MLG和考虑的动态,仍然有必要完善的分析类别,并将其应用于实证研究,以更好地了解的机制和条件,使治理工作在多级结构。
This chapter draws conclusions from what we have learned from research on multilevel governance. Starting from the institutional constraints caused by multiple linkages between levels of government and administration, executive-parliament relations and policy sectors, it will discuss the various ways actors can deal with these constraints. Some of the strategies aimed at avoiding conflicts or vetoes have negative effects for effectiveness or democratic legitimacy, while others, taking advantage of the institutional diversity and dynamics, facilitate reducing these consequences. Therefore, complexity of governance constrains and enables policy-making in a particular way, as is expected from liberal and democratic government. Managing this dilemma requires flexible structures and strategic actors. The resulting dynamics of MLG can either destabilize or restore a balance of power. While comparative research has discovered various patterns of coordination and policy-making in MLG and considered dynamics, there is still the need to refine the analytical categories and apply them in empirical research in order to better understand the mechanisms and conditions which make governance work in multilevel structures.
真正的演员可以玩的游戏:复杂性的挑战
DOI: 10.1177/0951692891003003003
发表时间: 1991
影响因子: 1
作者:
F. Scharpf
通讯作者: F. Scharpf
DOI: 10.18278/epa.2.2.11
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
A. Benz
通讯作者: A. Benz
复合共和国中的政府间关系:从合作联邦制到两极分化联邦制的历程
DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjw036
发表时间: 2017
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Timothy J. Conlan
通讯作者: Timothy J. Conlan
梅赫雷本系统中的政治
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-91536-4
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
A. Benz
通讯作者: A. Benz
加拿大联邦主义
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-91477-0
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Jörg Broschek
通讯作者: Jörg Broschek