A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.
A Brief Measure of Fidelity for Mindfulness Programs: Development and Evaluation of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions Tool.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1177/27536130231174234
复制
发表时间:
2023-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Morone, Natalia E.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Greco, Carol M.;Dore, Graham A.;Weinberg, Janice M.;Roth, Isabel;Thomas, Holly N.;Lawrence, Suzanne;Rodriguez, Ruth;McGillis, Megan;Morone, Natalia E.
关键词:
Mindfulness research and clinical programs are widespread, and it is important that mindfulness-based interventions are delivered with fidelity, or as intended, across settings. The MBI:TAC is a comprehensive system for assessing teacher competence, yet it can be complex to implement. A standardized, simple fidelity/engagement tool to address treatment delivery is needed. We describe the development, evaluation, and outcomes of a brief, practical tool for assessing fidelity and engagement in online mindfulness-based programs. The tool contains questions about session elements such as meditation guidance and group discussion, and questions about participant engagement and technology-based barriers to engagement. The fidelity rating tool was developed and tested in OPTIMUM, Optimizing Pain Treatment in Medical settings Using Mindfulness. The OPTIMUM study is a 3-site pragmatic randomized trial of group medical visits and adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction for primary care patients with chronic low back pain, delivered online. Two trained study personnel independently rated 26 recorded OPTIMUM sessions to determine inter-rater reliability of the Concise Fidelity for Mindfulness-Based Interventions (CoFi-MBI) tool. Trained raters also completed the CoFi-MBI for 105 sessions. Raters provided qualitative data via optional open text fields within the tool. Inter-rater agreement was 77-100% for presence of key session components, and 69-88% for Likert ratings of participant engagement and challenges related to technology, with discrepancies only occurring within 2 categories: ‘very much’ and ‘quite a bit’. Key session components occurred as intended in 94-100% of the 105 sessions, and participant engagement was rated as ‘very much’ or ‘quite a bit’ in 95% of the sessions. Qualitative analysis of rater comments revealed themes related to engagement challenges and technology failures. The CoFi-MBI provides a practical way to assess basic adherence to online delivery of mindfulness session elements, participant engagement, and extent of technology obstacles. Optional text can guide strategies to improve engagement and reduce technology barriers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Griffith G;Crane R
通讯作者:
Crane R
DOI:
10.1007/s12160-016-9844-2
发表时间:
2017-04
期刊:
Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Hilton L;Hempel S;Ewing BA;Apaydin E;Xenakis L;Newberry S;Colaiaco B;Maher AR;Shanman RM;Sorbero ME;Maglione MA
通讯作者:
Maglione MA
影响因子:
39.2
作者:
Qaseem, Amir;Wilt, Timothy J.;Forciea, Mary Ann
通讯作者:
Forciea, Mary Ann
影响因子:
6.1
作者:
Gu, Qiang;Hou, Jin-Chao;Fang, Xiang-Ming
通讯作者:
Fang, Xiang-Ming
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2016.2323
发表时间:
2016-03-22
期刊:
JAMA
影响因子:
--
作者:
Cherkin DC;Sherman KJ;Balderson BH;Cook AJ;Anderson ML;Hawkes RJ;Hansen KE;Turner JA
通讯作者:
Turner JA