Sense of Place, Fast and Slow: The Potential Contributions of Affordance Theory to Sense of Place.
Sense of Place, Fast and Slow: The Potential Contributions of Affordance Theory to Sense of Place.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01674
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Stedman R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Raymond CM;Kyttä M;Stedman R
在过去的40年里，地方感的概念已经在一系列的应用和环境中得到了很好的确立；然而，大多数理论的发展都“优待慢的人”。有证据表明，地点依恋和地点意义演变缓慢，有时与物质或社会现实(滞后效应)不符，也倾向于抑制变化。在这里，我们提出了地方感学术中的一些关键盲点，然后建议如何将地方感重新考虑为“快”和“慢”来填补它们。我们的意思是，在负担能力理论中呈现的直接和即时的知觉-行动过程(导致立即感知的位置意义)如何能够补充在位置感学术中呈现的较慢形式的社会建构。主要的盲点是位置感理论：(1)很少解释感觉或直接感知的意义；(2)很少关注位置意义是环境特征属性和个体属性的联合产物；(3)假设位置依恋与行为之间是线性的关系，而不是心理、文化和环境之间的动态关系。我们展示了如何通过回顾负担能力理论的关键见解并通过应用实例的展示来开始解决这些盲点。我们从以下几个方面讨论了未来的实证研究方向：(1)位置感是如何被感知和社会建构的；(2)当感知意义变得不是情境时，位置的感知维度和社会构建维度是否相互关联；(3)基于知觉-行动过程和社会构建过程之间的动态关系，位置依恋如何在生命过程的不同阶段发生变化。最后，我们对如何将感知-行动和社会构建的过程纳入城市景观的设计和管理进行了深入的探讨。
Over the past 40 years, the sense of place concept has been well-established across a range of applications and settings; however, most theoretical developments have “privileged the slow.” Evidence suggests that place attachments and place meanings are slow to evolve, sometimes not matching material or social reality (lag effects), and also tending to inhibit change. Here, we present some key blind spots in sense of place scholarship and then suggest how a reconsideration of sense of place as “fast” and “slow” could fill them. By this, we mean how direct and immediate perception–action processes presented in affordance theory (resulting in immediately perceived place meanings) can complement slower forms of social construction presented in sense of place scholarship. Key blind spots are that sense of place scholarship: (1) rarely accounts for sensory or immediately perceived meanings; (2) pays little attention to how place meanings are the joint product of attributes of environmental features and the attributes of the individual; and (3) assumes that the relationship between place attachment and behavior is linear and not constituted in dynamic relations among mind, culture, and environment. We show how these blind spots can begin to be addressed by reviewing key insights from affordance theory, and through the presentation of applied examples. We discuss future empirical research directions in terms of: (1) how sense of place is both perceived and socially constructed; (2) whether perceived and socially constructed dimensions of place can relate to one another when perceived meanings become unsituated; and (3) how place attachment may change over different stages of the life course based upon dynamic relationships between processes of perception–action and social construction. We conclude with insights into how processes of perception–action and social construction could be included in the design and management of urban landscapes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.9
作者：
Bailey, Etienne;Devine-Wright, Patrick;Batel, Susana
通讯作者：
Batel, Susana
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Beckley, Thomas M.;Stedman, Richard C.;Ambard, Marke
通讯作者：
Ambard, Marke
影响因子：
4.8
作者：
Brown, Katrina M.
通讯作者：
Brown, Katrina M.
影响因子：
3
作者：
Anderson, Michael L.;Richardson, Michael J.;Chemero, Anthony
通讯作者：
Chemero, Anthony
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
发表时间：
2011-08-01
影响因子：
8.9
作者：
Armitage, Derek;Berkes, Fikret;Patton, Eva
通讯作者：
Patton, Eva