Manipulating memory efficacy affects the behavioral and neural profiles of deterministic learning and decision-making.

Manipulating memory efficacy affects the behavioral and neural profiles of deterministic learning and decision-making.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.023
复制
发表时间:
2018-06
期刊:
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Fiez JA
Fiez JA
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tremel JJ;Ortiz DM;Fiez JA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

When making a decision, we have to identify, collect, and evaluate relevant bits of information to ensure an optimal outcome. How we approach a given choice can be influenced by prior experience. Contextual factors and structural elements of these past decisions can cause a shift in how information is encoded and can in turn influence later decision-making. In this two-experiment study, we sought to manipulate declarative memory efficacy and decision-making in a concurrent discrimination learning task by altering the amount of information to be learned. Subjects learned correct responses to pairs of items across several repetitions of a 50- or 100-pair set and were tested for memory retention. In one experiment, this memory test interrupted learning after an initial encoding experience in order to test for early encoding differences and associate those differences with changes in decision-making. In a second experiment, we used fMRI to probe neural differences between the two list-length groups related to decision-making across learning and assessed subsequent memory retention. We found that a striatum-based system was associated with decision-making patterns when learning a longer list of items, while a medial cortical network was associated with patterns when learning a shorter list. Additionally, the hippocampus was exclusively active for the shorter list group. Altogether, these behavioral, computational, and imaging results provide evidence that multiple types of mnemonic representations contribute to experienced-based decision-making. Moreover, contextual and structural factors of the task and of prior decisions can influence what types of evidence are drawn upon during decision-making.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003387
发表时间: 2013
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Bornstein AM;Daw ND
通讯作者: Daw ND
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4421-06.2007
发表时间: 2007-01-10
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Cohen, Michael X.;Ranganath, Charan
通讯作者: Ranganath, Charan
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00365-5
发表时间: 2001-12-14
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Eichenbaum, H
通讯作者: Eichenbaum, H
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.027
发表时间: 2011-03-24
期刊: Neuron
影响因子: 16.2
作者:
Daw ND;Gershman SJ;Seymour B;Dayan P;Dolan RJ
通讯作者: Dolan RJ
DOI: 10.1038/nature03857
发表时间: 2005-07-28
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Bayley, PJ;Frascino, JC;Squire, LR
通讯作者: Squire, LR