The hundred-year emotion war: are emotions natural kinds or psychological constructions? Comment on Lench, Flores, and Bench (2011).
The hundred-year emotion war: are emotions natural kinds or psychological constructions? Comment on Lench, Flores, and Bench (2011).
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0029038
复制
发表时间：
2013-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
Barrett, Lisa Feldman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lindquist, Kristen A.;Siegel, Erika H.;Quigley, Karen S.;Barrett, Lisa Feldman
在上个世纪，关于情感的本质一直存在着争论。在这场科学对话的最新成果中，报告了对情绪诱导研究的元分析，并声称支持自然类型假说，即离散情绪（例如，快乐、悲伤、愤怒和焦虑）引起认知、判断、行为、经验和生理的特定变化。在本文中，我们指出，这不是情感辩论的最终结果。首先，我们指出，Lench et al.的研究结果并不支持他们的主张，离散的情绪组织认知，判断，经验，和生理，因为他们没有表现出情绪一致的和具体的方向变化，在这些测量领域。第二，我们指出，Lench et al.'的发现实际上与另一种观点（情绪的心理建构主义方法）一致。最后，我们呼吁情绪研究的结构效度方法，我们希望这将导致更大的共识的自然类和心理结构的方法，以及最终解决情绪辩论所需的标准的可操作性。
For the last century, there has been a continuing debate about the nature of emotion. In the most recent offering in this scientific dialogue, report a meta-analysis of emotion induction research and claim support for the natural kind hypothesis that discrete emotions (e.g., happiness, sadness, anger, and anxiety) elicit specific changes in cognition, judgment, behavior, experience, and physiology. In this paper, we point out that is not the final word on the emotion debate. First, we point out that Lench et al.’s findings do not support their claim that discrete emotions organize cognition, judgment, experience, and physiology because they did not demonstrate emotion-consistent and -specific directional changes in these measurement domains. Second, we point out that Lench et al.’s findings are in fact consistent with the alternative (a psychological constructionist approach to emotion). We close by appealing for a construct validity approach to emotion research, which we hope will lead to greater consensus on the operationalization of the natural kind and psychological construction approaches, as well as the criteria required to finally resolve the emotion debate.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00404-8
发表时间：
2009-01-01
期刊：
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 41
影响因子：
--
作者：
Barrett, Lisa Feldman;Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
通讯作者：
Bliss-Moreau, Eliza
影响因子：
3
作者：
Christie, IC;Friedman, BH
通讯作者：
Friedman, BH
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Coan, James A.
通讯作者：
Coan, James A.
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
CAMPBELL, DT;FISKE, DW
通讯作者：
FISKE, DW
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Duffy, Elizabeth
通讯作者：
Duffy, Elizabeth