Innovation in bone technology and artefact types in the late Upper Palaeolithic of China: Insights from Shuidonggou Locality 12

Innovation in bone technology and artefact types in the late Upper Palaeolithic of China: Insights from Shuidonggou Locality 12
复制标题

中国旧石器时代晚期骨技术和文物类型的创新:水洞沟地点 12 的见解

DOI:
10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.003
复制
发表时间:
2018-05
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
d'Errico Francesco
d'Errico Francesco
中科院分区:
地球科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang Shuangquan;Doyon Luc;Zhang Yue;Gao Xing;Chen Fuyou;Guan Ying;d'Errico Francesco

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

关于中国旧石器时代骨骼技术的信息很少。本文介绍了对中国北方北方水洞沟12号地点第11层出土的一个骨制工具组合进行技术功能分析的结果。血压12-11卡确定了六种骨工具人工制品类型:楔子、锥子、矛头、刀柄、可能的缝纫工具和有缺口的腕骨。另外两件人工制品无法归因于特定类型。人工制品由普氏原羚,Sussp.,普氏野马,以及来自中型/大型哺乳动物的无法识别的骨碎片。至少有三种方法用于提取空白:敲击改变的肢体骨骼,纵向分裂的Sussp。犬齿和大肋骨,可能还有,切槽和碎片技术磨削和刮削是主要的成型技术,还有开槽、开槽、抛光、钻孔、剥落和修饰。工具类型的可变性和功能符合这一假设,根据这一假设,SDG 12和类似的地点将是住宅营地,狩猎采集者在其中生产人工制品,使他们能够科普寒冷的环境条件。然而,我们的研究结果表明,并非所有的骨工具都符合与连续专业生产相关的期望。在需要的时候,该集团的任何成员都可以生产方便的楔形物和锥子。SDG 12骨工具组合为我们了解狩猎采集者对北方冰后期环境的适应做出了重要贡献。
Information on Palaeolithic bone technology from China is sparse. Here we present the results of a techno-functional analysis of a bone tool assemblage recovered from Shuidonggou Locality 12 (SDG12), layer 11, Northern China, dated to c. 12-11 cal ka BP. Six bone tool artefact types are identified: wedges, awls, spear points, a knife handle, a possible sewing implement, and a notched carpal. Two other artefacts could not be attributed to a specific type. The artefacts are made ofProcapra przewalsikii,Lepussp.,Sussp.,Equus przewalskii, and unidentifiable bone fragments from medium/large size mammals. At least three methods are used to extract blanks: percussion of altered limb bones, longitudinal splitting ofSussp. canine and large rib, and probably, the groove-and-splinter technique. Grinding and scraping are the dominant shaping techniques together with grooving, notching, polishing, drilling, flaking, and retouching. Tool type variability and function fit the hypothesis according to which the SDG12 and similar sites would be residential camps in which hunter-gatherers produced artefacts enabling them to cope with cold environmental conditions. Our results, however, indicate that not all bone tools match the expectations associated with a serial specialist production. Expedient wedges and awls may have been produced by any member of the group, and whenever the need arose. The SDG12 bone tool assemblage provides a significant contribution to our knowledge about hunter-gatherer adaptations to the Tardiglacial environments of Northern China.
DOI: 10.30861/9781407300344
发表时间: 2007
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Pierre;R. Walker
通讯作者: C. Pierre;R. Walker
DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2011.12.001
发表时间: 2012-05
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
C. Jéquier;Matteo Romandini;Marco Peresani
通讯作者: C. Jéquier;Matteo Romandini;Marco Peresani
马鞍山溶洞与中国骨器技术的起源
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.11.004
发表时间: 2016
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Backwell, Lucinda R.;Zhang, Yue;Chen, Fuyou;Gao, Xing
通讯作者: Gao, Xing
DOI: 10.1179/009346908791071196
发表时间: 2008-01
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
A. Legrand;G. Radi
通讯作者: A. Legrand;G. Radi
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.03.007
发表时间: 2006-09
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Z. Jacobs;G. Duller;A. Wintle;C. Henshilwood
通讯作者: Z. Jacobs;G. Duller;A. Wintle;C. Henshilwood