Influence of motor skills training on children's development evaluated in the Motor skills in PreSchool (MiPS) study-DK: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, nested in a cohort study.
Influence of motor skills training on children's development evaluated in the Motor skills in PreSchool (MiPS) study-DK: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, nested in a cohort study.
复制标题
运动技能培训对学龄前儿童运动技能（MIPS）研究-DK的儿童发展的影响：一项随机对照试验的研究方案，该试验嵌套在队列研究中。
DOI：
10.1186/s13063-017-2143-9
复制
发表时间：
2017-08-29
期刊：
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Lauridsen HH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hestbaek L;Andersen ST;Skovgaard T;Olesen LG;Elmose M;Bleses D;Andersen SC;Lauridsen HH
良好的运动技能被认为对儿童的身体、社交和心理发展很重要，但人们对这种关系仍然知之甚少。学龄前年龄似乎对运动技能的发展起决定性作用，可能是基于改进运动技能的预防策略方面最有希望的时间窗口。这项研究计划有四个总体目标：(1)调查旨在提高3-6岁儿童运动技能的结构化计划对当前和未来运动技能、健康、认知和幸福感的影响；(2)建立关于3-6岁儿童运动技能的参考数据；(3)描述肌肉骨骼问题的早期发展；以及(4)建立以人群为基础的3-6岁儿童队列。在四年的时间里，丹麦斯文德堡市的所有幼儿园都将实施一项旨在优化儿童运动技能的新计划。通过在开始时将该计划引入学前教育的一个子集，并将这些儿童与前三年不接受干预的另一个子集(对照组)进行比较，就有可能证明干预的潜在效果。同时，将建立一个包括该市所有学前教育的儿童的队列，并收集广泛的基线数据：粗略和精细的运动技能；运动模式；肌肉骨骼疾病；体力活动；人体测量；一般健康状况；认知能力；语言状况；病史；人口背景等。按基线计算，这些儿童的年龄为3-6岁。共有1461名儿童被邀请进入队列，368名儿童被邀请到干预组，359名儿童被邀请到对照组。该试验的随访时间为2.5年。这一队列计划至少持续到孩子们15-16岁离开学校。更长的后续行动将取决于未来的资金。如果试验结果是肯定的，干预可以在其他类似的环境中以合理的容易和相对较低的初始成本实施。这是由于终端用户的广泛参与、广泛的人口基础以及干预的务实性质。该队列将提供有关早期运动技能在许多领域对儿童发展的影响以及这些领域之间潜在相互作用的重要信息。ISRCTN注册表，ISRCTN23701994。注册日期为2016年10月13日。本文的在线版本(doi：10.1186/s13063-017-2143-9)包含补充材料，授权用户可以使用。
Good motor skills are considered important for children’s physical, social, and psychological development, but the relationship is still poorly understood. Preschool age seems to be decisive for the development of motor skills and probably the most promising time-window in relation to preventive strategies based on improved motor skills. This research program has four overall aims: (1) investigation of the effect of a structured program aimed at improving motor skills in 3–6-year-old children on current and future motor skills, health, cognition, and wellbeing; (2) establish reference data on motor skills in 3–6-year-olds; (3) description of early development of musculoskeletal problems; and (4) establishment of a population-based cohort of 3–6-year-olds. Over a four-year period, all preschools in a Danish municipality, Svendborg, will implement a new program aimed at optimizing children’s motor skills. By introducing the program into a subset of the preschools at onset and comparing these children to another subset (control) that will not receive the intervention the first three years, it is possible to document a potential effect of the intervention. At the same time, a cohort will be established including all children attending preschools in the municipality with extensive baseline data collection: gross and fine motor skills; movement patterns; musculoskeletal complaints; physical activity; anthropometry; general wellbeing; cognitive abilities; language status; medical history; demographic background; and more. The children are aged 3–6 years at baseline. A total of 1461 children have been invited into the cohort, 368 to the intervention arm and 359 to the control arm. Follow-up time for the trial is 2.5 years. The cohort is planned to run at least until the children leave school at age 15–16 years. Longer follow-up will depend on future funding. If the results of the trial are positive, the intervention can be implemented in other similar settings with reasonable ease and at a relatively low initial cost. This is due to the extensive end-user involvement, the broad population base, and the pragmatic nature of the intervention. The cohort will provide important information about the influence of early motor skills on children’s development across many domains and the potential interactions between these domains. ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN23701994. Registered on 13 October 2016. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2143-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Klakk H;Chinapaw M;Heidemann M;Andersen LB;Wedderkopp N
通讯作者：
Wedderkopp N
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Bellows, Laura L.;Davies, Patricia L.;Kennedy, Catherine
通讯作者：
Kennedy, Catherine
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Ellinoudis, Theodoros;Evaggelinou, Christina;Kambas, Antonis
通讯作者：
Kambas, Antonis
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Donath, L.;Faude, O.;Zahner, L.
通讯作者：
Zahner, L.
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Kakebeeke, Tanja H.;Knaier, Elisa;Jenni, Oskar G.
通讯作者：
Jenni, Oskar G.