Left ventricular infarct size, peri-infarct zone, and papillary scar measurements: A comparison of high-resolution 3D and conventional 2D late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR.
Left ventricular infarct size, peri-infarct zone, and papillary scar measurements: A comparison of high-resolution 3D and conventional 2D late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.21897
复制
发表时间:
2009-10
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Manning, Warren J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Peters, Dana C.;Appelbaum, Evan A.;Nezafat, Reza;Dokhan, Basem;Han, Yuchi;Kissinger, Kraig V.;Goddu, Beth;Manning, Warren J.
关键词:
To compare higher spatial resolution 3D late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular MR (Cardiac MR) with 2D LGE in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Fourteen patients were studied using high spatial resolution 3D LGE (1.3×1.3× 5.0 mm3) and conventional 2D LGE (2×2×8mm3) scans. SNR and CNR were measured. Total infarct volume, peri-infarct volume measured in a limited slab, and papillary muscle scar volume were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. Image quality was graded. 3D LGE had higher scar SNR (p<0.001), higher myocardial SNR (p=0.001), higher papillary scar-blood CNR (p=0.01), and greater sharpness (p=0.01). The scar volumes agreed (14.5±8.2 for 2D, vs. 13.2±8.8 for 3D), with bias ±2 SDs of 0.5±6.8ml, p=0.59 R=0.91. The peri-infarct volumes correlated but less strongly than scar (p=0.40, R=0.77). For patients with more heterogeneous scar, larger peri-infarct volumes were measured by 3D (1.9±1.1ml for 2D vs. 2.4±1.6 ml for 3D, p=0.15, in the matched region). Papillary scar, present in 6/14 (42%) patients, was more confidently identified on 3D LGE. Higher spatial resolution 3D LGE provides sharper images and higher SNR, but less myocardial nulling. Scar volumes agree well, with peri-infarct volumes correlating less well. 3D LGE may be superior in visualization of papillary muscle scar.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
24
作者:
Amado, LC;Gerber, BL;Lima, JAC
通讯作者:
Lima, JAC
影响因子:
37.8
作者:
Schmidt, Andre;Azevedo, Clerio F.;Wu, Katherine C.
通讯作者:
Wu, Katherine C.
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Good, Eric;Desjardins, Benoit;Bogun, Frank
通讯作者:
Bogun, Frank
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Goldfarb, JW;Mathew, ST;Reichek, N
通讯作者:
Reichek, N
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Kim, RJ;Wu, E;Judd, RM
通讯作者:
Judd, RM