Size Does Matter: Application-driven Approaches for Soil Metagenomics.
Size Does Matter: Application-driven Approaches for Soil Metagenomics.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.021
复制
发表时间:
2010-11-01
影响因子:
9.7
通讯作者:
Liles, Mark R.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kakirde, Kavita S.;Parsley, Larissa C.;Liles, Mark R.
关键词:
Metagenomic analyses can provide extensive information on the structure, composition, and predicted gene functions of diverse environmental microbial assemblages. Each environment presents its own unique challenges to metagenomic investigation and requires a specifically designed approach to accommodate physicochemical and biotic factors unique to each environment that can pose technical hurdles and/or bias the metagenomic analyses. In particular, soils harbor an exceptional diversity of prokaryotes that are largely undescribed beyond the level of ribotype and are a potentially vast resource for natural product discovery. The successful application of a soil metagenomic approach depends on selecting the appropriate DNA extraction, purification, and if necessary, cloning methods for the intended downstream analyses. The most important technical considerations in a metagenomic study include obtaining a sufficient yield of high-purity DNA representing the targeted microorganisms within an environmental sample or enrichment and (if required) constructing a metagenomic library in a suitable vector and host. Size does matter in the context of the average insert size within a clone library or the sequence read length for a high-throughput sequencing approach. It is also imperative to select the appropriate metagenomic screening strategy to address the specific question(s) of interest, which should drive the selection of methods used in the earlier stages of a metagenomic project (e.g., DNA size, to clone or not to clone). Here, we present both the promising and problematic nature of soil metagenomics and discuss the factors that should be considered when selecting soil sampling, DNA extraction, purification, and cloning methods to implement based on the ultimate study objectives.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Cosgrove, L.;McGeechan, P. L.;Robson, G. D.
通讯作者:
Robson, G. D.
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0806191105
发表时间:
2009-02-10
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Brulc, Jennifer M.;Antonopoulos, Dionysios A.;White, Bryan A.
通讯作者:
White, Bryan A.
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Chung, Eu Jin;Lim, He Kyoung;Lee, Seon-Woo
通讯作者:
Lee, Seon-Woo
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Craig, Jeffrey W.;Chang, Fang-Yuan;Brady, Sean F.
通讯作者:
Brady, Sean F.
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Béjà, O;Aravind, L;DeLong, EF
通讯作者:
DeLong, EF