Subsidize farmers or bioenergy producer? The design of a government subsidy program for a bioenergy supply chain

Subsidize farmers or bioenergy producer? The design of a government subsidy program for a bioenergy supply chain
复制标题

补贴农民或生物能源生产商?

DOI:
10.1002/nav.21909
复制
发表时间:
2020-05
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Gang Hou
Gang Hou
中科院分区:
管理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fei Ye;Zigong Cai;Ying-Ju Chen;Yina Li;Gang Hou

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

生物能源行业的成功在一定程度上将取决于是否种植了足够的生物质原料。为了提高原料供应的可靠性,政府可以提供两种补贴计划:农民补贴计划(FSP)和生物能源生产商补贴计划(PSP)。我们建立模型,通过捕捉政府、生物能源生产商和农民之间的互动,来分析最优补贴计划。该模型考虑了补贴预算约束、生物能源利用的环境效益、农户的风险厌恶和土地容量约束以及原料产量的不确定性。研究结果表明,只要农民的土地容量超过某一门槛,FSP和PSP都是有效的。如果补贴预算和土地容量都足够大,则PSP优于FSP;如果只有补贴预算有限,则FSP更好;如果只有土地容量有限,则FSP和PSP是等价的。与直觉相反的是,我们发现PSP总是更有利于农民,而FSP在一定条件下更有利于生物能源生产商。此外,我们还发现,当收益率不确定性较高时,FSP比PSP能更好地缓解风险。最后,重点介绍了政策制定者对促进生物能源发展的见解。
The success of the bioenergy industry will depend, in part, on enough biomass feedstocks being grown. To increase the reliability of feedstocks supply, a government can offer two types of subsidy program: a farmer subsidy program (FSP) and a bioenergy producer subsidy program (PSP). We develop models to analyze the optimal subsidy program by capturing the interactions between the government, the bioenergy producer, and the farmers. The models incorporate the subsidy budget constraint, the environmental benefits from the use of bioenergy, the farmer's risk aversion and land capacity constraint, as well as the yield uncertainty of feedstocks. The findings reveal that both FSP and PSP are effective as long as the farmers' land capacity exceeds a threshold. If both the subsidy budget and the land capacity are sufficiently large, PSP outperforms FSP; if only the subsidy budget is limited, FSP is better; if only the land capacity is limited, FSP and PSP are equivalent. Counter‐intuitively, we find that PSP always favors farmers more, while FSP favors the bioenergy producer more under certain conditions. Also, we find that FSP can better mitigate risk than PSP when yield uncertainty is high. Lastly, insights for policy makers to promote bioenergy development are highlighted.
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.001
发表时间: 2016-02
期刊: Energy Economics
影响因子: 12.8
作者:
M. Khanna;H. Núñez;D. Zilberman
通讯作者: M. Khanna;H. Núñez;D. Zilberman
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.10.007
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 10.6
作者:
M. Roni;S. Eksioglu;E. Searcy;Krishna C. Jha
通讯作者: M. Roni;S. Eksioglu;E. Searcy;Krishna C. Jha
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.13411
发表时间: 1997
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
W. Peterson
通讯作者: W. Peterson
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.114
发表时间: 2017
期刊: Energy
影响因子: 9
作者:
Ye Fei;Li Yina;Lin Qiang;Zhan Yuanzhu;Li YN;Lin Q
通讯作者: Lin Q
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.139
发表时间: 2016-10-15
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Jakrawatana, Napat;Pingmuangleka, Prus;Gheewala, Shabbir H.
通讯作者: Gheewala, Shabbir H.