Why Egalitarianism Might Be Good for Your Health
Why Egalitarianism Might Be Good for Your Health
复制标题
为什么平等主义可能有益于您的健康
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Epel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wendy Berry Mendes;H. Gray;Rodolfo Mendoza;B. Major;E. Epel
我们比较了群体外成员和群体内成员的评价如何影响参与者的压力反应——他们的神经内分泌反应、认知评价和观察焦虑——以及参与者的隐性种族偏见如何调节这些反应。具体来说，白人参与者在实验前完成了种族偏见的测量。在实验中，参与者在白人或黑人面试官面前进行演讲和连续减法任务。获得了一些唾液样本，并对它们进行了分解代谢（“分解”）和合成代谢（“生成”）激素的检测。访谈者的种族和参与者的种族偏见在预测压力反应方面相互作用。当面试官是黑人时，更低的种族偏见与更有益的压力反应有关：更低的威胁评估，更少的焦虑和更高的合成代谢激素水平。当面试官是白人时，对威胁评估或合成代谢激素没有影响，而对焦虑则有相反的影响。对于生活在一个多元化社会中的人们来说，平均主义可能有生理和心理上的好处。
We compared how evaluations by out-group members and evaluations by in-group members affected participants' stress responses—their neuroendocrine reactivity, cognitive appraisals, and observed anxiety—and how participants' implicit racial bias moderated these responses. Specifically, White participants completed measures of racial bias prior to the experiment. During the experiment, participants performed speech and serial subtraction tasks in front of White or Black interviewers. Several saliva samples were obtained, and they were assayed for catabolic (“breaking down”) and anabolic (“building up”) hormones. Interviewers' race and participants' racial bias interacted in predicting stress responses. When interviewers were Black, lower racial bias was linked with more salutary stress responses: lower threat appraisals, less anxiety, and increased levels of anabolic hormones. When interviewers were White, no effect was found for threat appraisals or anabolic hormones, and the reverse effect was observed for anxiety. Egalitarianism may have physical and psychological benefits for people living in a diverse society.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者：
Schwartz, JLK
现代人的偏见和结构特征调节了合作对情感的影响。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Vanman,EJ;Paul,BY;Ito,TA;Miller,N
通讯作者：
Miller,N