Glucose sensing network in Candida albicans: a sweet spot for fungal morphogenesis.
Glucose sensing network in Candida albicans: a sweet spot for fungal morphogenesis.
复制标题
白色念珠菌中的葡萄糖传感网络:真菌形态发生的最佳点。
DOI:
10.1128/ec.00138-09
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Brown,Victoria
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sabina,Jeffrey;Brown,Victoria
Glucose, a ubiquitous carbon source preferred by most cells (96), was first identified by Andreas Marggraf in 1747 (67). Even though it is the most abundant hexose on earth (33), glucose is often a limiting nutrient in biological systems (2); it is a precious resource for which organisms fiercely compete (54). An elegant genetic illustration of this is the fact that organisms from bacteria to humans have highly evolved sensing and signaling machinery dedicated to the detection, acquisition, and utilization of glucose (38, 76, 80, 108). The framework for understanding sugar sensing in fungi began with studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker’s yeast). This model eukaryote is a voracious glucophile that rapidly metabolizes glucose to produce massive amounts of CO2 and ethanol, a trait refined over at least 4,000 years of human civilization (104). The distantly related human pathogen Candida albicans has become an organism of choice for fungal genetics, motivated by its huge impact on human health and thanks to recently developed genetic and biochemical tools for its analysis (4, 11, 68, 91). In the 200 million years since C. albicans and S. cerevisiae last shared a common ancestor (27, 84), genetic drift combined with adaptation to differing environments has drastically “rewired” the regulatory circuitry of the sugar response network (12, 63, 83). For C. albicans, glucose is also a morphogen that inffuences yeast-to-hypha transitions (37), and this trait is critical for optimal virulence in the host (reviewed in reference 7). Both fungi sense glucose mainly through three pathways, none of which operates in isolation (Fig. 1):(i) the SRR (sugar receptor-repressor) pathway,(ii) the glucose repression pathway, and (iii) the adenylate cyclase pathway. Each system utilizes a distinct signal transduction cascade, but extensive cross-regulation weaves them together into a single sugar response network. SRR pathway. Hexose transporters, which are 12 transmembrane-spanning proteins that form substrate-selective pores in the plasma membrane, facilitate glucose uptake into eukaryotic cells (42, 53). The transporters are part of a very large protein family called the major facilitator superfamily whose members transport solutes by facilitated diffusion (not to be confused with symporting or antiporting) of molecules (28, 42, 98, 108). They are encoded by large gene families (up to 17 members) and can harbor species-specific protein signatures that make them novel drug targets in eukaryotic pathogens (31). In fungi, select members of the large hexose transporter family have evolved into sensors of glucose and other structurally related hexoses.S. cerevisiae employs both a high-affinity (Snf3) and a lowaffinity (Rgt2) glucose sensor poised in the plasma membrane to monitor glucose levels in the environment (70). Although direct binding to hexoses has not been demonstrated, Snf3 and Rgt2 are almost certainly glucose receptors because they are highly similar to hexose transporters throughout their sugarbinding domains, and they are critical for the cell’s response to glucose (70). Sensors of this type are incapable of importing glucose, and what insight can be gleaned from work on functional transporters (ie, human GLUT1 or yeast Hxt/Hgt proteins) does not yet resolve the molecular basis underlying a sensors’ inability to transport (22, 43, 44, 77). Instead, sensors generate an intracellular signal that induces the expression of appropriate hexose transporter (HXT) genes. Each sensor has a C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (absent from transporters) that is neither necessary nor sufficient for signal generation and that does not physically occlude transport (65). Therefore, it is believed …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kaniak, A;Xue, ZX;Johnston, M
通讯作者:
Johnston, M
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Joanne Lemieux
通讯作者:
M. Joanne Lemieux
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
DeVit, MJ;Waddle, JA;Johnston, M
通讯作者:
Johnston, M
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
J. Sexton;V. Brown;M. Johnston
通讯作者:
M. Johnston
影响因子:
--
作者:
Miwa, T;Takagi, Y;Tamaki, H
通讯作者:
Tamaki, H