JMT's Research Concepts Section: a 5-Year Evaluation.
JMT's Research Concepts Section: a 5-Year Evaluation.
复制标题
JMT 的研究概念部分：五年评估。
DOI：
10.1007/s13181-019-00725-y
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mycyk,MarkB
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jang,DavidH;Love,JenniferS;Mycyk,MarkB
“概念”部分，使研究人员能够更快地推进他们的研究。本节的目标有三个：(1)提供一个快速发布同行评议研究的论坛；(2)从已获得资助的研究者那里获得高水平的批判性评价；(3)支持未来的校外资助申请。为了实现这些目标，该部分对试点数据和新颖的研究概念开放，使研究人员有机会接触到更多的受众，这些高风险的想法如果进行到下一步，可能会产生高影响。不出所料，最初招募投稿比我们其他版块慢，但最终那些在Research Concepts上发表作品的作者都很热情，并将其推荐给了其他人。有趣的是，在这里发表文章的作者将随后的资助和合作归功于该出版物。其他没有在《研究概念》上发表文章的人报告说，不确定该部分是否能提供所需的进展。当我们考虑如何改进JMT并更好地为读者和作者服务时，我们认为这将是评估JMT研究概念部分的合适时机。我们系统地审查了2014年至2018年五年间提交给“研究概念”部分的所有内容，以确定是否有任何校外资助。除了审查我们的电子编辑管理系统中包含的所有相关手稿数据外，我们还联系了第一作者，以确定发表与随后的资助之间是否存在关联。我们特别询问了在拨款申请中对稿件的任何引用。我们在分析中考虑了所有形式的校外资助。从2014年到2018年，JMT研究概念部分发表了八篇文章：每篇文章都由至少两名先前资助的同行审稿人审查。从提交到第一次决定平均时间为14.1天；6篇论文在发表前需要一次修改，2篇需要多次修改[2 - 9]。第一作者的机构归属包括马萨诸塞大学的5份手稿，宾夕法尼亚大学的2份手稿，爱荷华州立大学的1份手稿。5篇论文聚焦于技术与毒理学的整合，3篇论文聚焦于基础科学研究。与被接受的手稿相关的多项资助，包括三项美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）职业发展奖（K08和K23），被机构KL2计划接受，以及NIH R21抵消资助。虽然5年8篇论文似乎不是一个很大的数字，但重要的是要记住，JMT只是一个季刊，活跃的医学毒理学研究者的数量仍然相当少。虽然JMT对作者的快速决定感到自豪，但看到研究概念部分的第一次决定时间比所有提交的手稿的平均时间要快，这是一个值得骄傲的地方。考虑到这些手稿需要至少两名资助研究人员的同行评审，这一点尤其引人注目，这比我们的其他手稿提交的专业水平要高得多，也更难招募。支持这个“快速同行评审和出版论坛”符合Steve Bird在解释本节目的首期社论b[1]中提到的第一个目标。其次，从第一作者那里了解到他们在JMT上发表论文后获得的许多不同的校外资助，符合同一篇社论中提到的更大的NIH利益。作为科学家，我们……
Concepts section in 2010 to allow investigators to advance their research more quickly [1]. The goals of this section are threefold:(1) to provide a forum for rapid publication of peerreviewed research;(2) to obtain high-level critical reviews from established funded investigators; and (3) to support future grant applications for extramural funding. To meet these goals, this section was open to pilot data as well as novel study concepts to give investigators an opportunity to reach a larger audience with high-risk ideas that had the potential for high impact if carried through to the next step. Not surprisingly, recruiting submissions was initially slower than for our other sections, but eventually those authors who published their work in Research Concepts were enthusiastic and recommended it to others. Anecdotally, authors who published here attributed subsequent grant funding and collaboration to this publication. Others who did not publish in Research Concepts reported uncertainty as to whether the section could provide the desired advancement. As we think about how to improve JMT and serve our readers and authors better, we thought this would be the right time to evaluate the JMT Research Concepts section. We systematically reviewed all submissions to the Research Concepts section during the five-year period from 2014 through 2018 to determine if any extramural funding followed publication. In addition to reviewing all relevant manuscript data included in our electronic editorial manager system, first authors were contacted to determine if there was an association between publication and subsequent grant funding. We specifically inquired about any reference to the manuscript in the grant submission. We considered all forms of extramural funding in our analysis.From 2014 through 2018, the JMT Research Concepts section published eight articles: each was reviewed by a minimum of two previously funded peer reviewers. Time from submission to first decision averaged 14.1 days; 6 manuscripts required one revision and 2 required multiple revisions before publication [2–9]. Institutional affiliation for the first author included 5 manuscripts for the University of Massachusetts, 2 manuscripts for the University of Pennsylvania, and one manuscript for Iowa State University. Five papers focused on the integration of technology and toxicology, while three papers focused on basic science research. Multiple grants were funded related to the accepted manuscripts, including three National Institutes of Health (NIH) career development awards (K08 and K23), acceptance into an institutional KL2 program, and an NIH R21 CounterACT grant. Although 8 manuscripts over 5 years does not seem to be a large number, it is important to remember that JMT is only a quarterly journal and the number of active medical toxicology investigators remains quite small. Although JMT prides itself on a rapid decision to authors, it is a point of pride to see the time to first decision for the Research Concepts section is faster than the average for all submitted manuscripts. This is particularly striking considering these manuscripts require peer review by at least two funded investigators, a level of expertise that is much higher and more difficult to recruit than for our other manuscript submissions. Supporting this “forum for rapid peer review and publication” meets the first goal mentioned by Steve Bird in the inaugural editorial that explained the purpose of this section [1]. Second, learning from the first authors about the many different extramural grants that were awarded to them following their publication in JMT meets the greater NIH benefit mentioned in that same editorial. As scientists we …
登录
查看更多内容
大鼠谷胱甘肽转移酶E的分离、性质及组织分布
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
D. Meyer;L. Christodoulides;K. Tan;B. Ketterer
通讯作者：
B. Ketterer
一组用于区分大鼠肝脏中谷胱甘肽转移酶基本同工酶的抑制剂。
DOI：
10.1016/0006-291x(83)90856-2
发表时间：
1983
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
S. Yalcin;H. Jensson;B. Mannervik
通讯作者：
B. Mannervik
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
CIOLI, D;PICAMATTOCCIA, L;ARCHER, S
通讯作者：
ARCHER, S
成年曼氏血吸虫对尼达唑的还原代谢。
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
J. W. Tracy;B. Catto;L. T. Webster
通讯作者：
L. T. Webster
蛋白质的快速色谱聚焦。
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Wagner,G;Regnier,FE
通讯作者：
Regnier,FE