Genetic and molecular characterization of three novel S-haplotypes in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.).
Genetic and molecular characterization of three novel S-haplotypes in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.).
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/jxb/ern172
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
6.9
通讯作者:
Iezzoni AF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tsukamoto T;Potter D;Tao R;Vieira CP;Vieira J;Iezzoni AF
Tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) exhibits gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) whereby the specificity of self-pollen rejection is controlled by alleles of the stylar and pollen specificity genes, S-RNase and SFB (S haplotype-specific F-box protein gene), respectively. As sour cherry selections can be either self-compatible (SC) or self-incompatible (SI), polyploidy per se does not result in SC. Instead the genotype-dependent loss of SI in sour cherry is due to the accumulation of non-functional S-haplotypes. The presence of two or more non-functional S-haplotypes within sour cherry 2x pollen renders that pollen SC. Two new S-haplotypes from sour cherry, S33 and S34, that are presumed to be contributed by the P. fruticosa species parent, the complete S-RNase and SFB sequences of a third S-haplotype, S35, plus the presence of two previously identified sweet cherry S-haplotypes, S14 and S16 are described here. Genetic segregation data demonstrated that the S16-, S33-, S34-, and S35-haplotypes present in sour cherry are fully functional. This result is consistent with our previous finding that ‘hetero-allelic’ pollen is incompatible in sour cherry. Phylogenetic analyses of the SFB and S-RNase sequences from available Prunus species reveal that the relationships among S-haplotypes show no correspondence to known organismal relationships at any taxonomic level within Prunus, indicating that polymorphisms at the S-locus have been maintained throughout the evolution of the genus. Furthermore, the phylogenetic relationships among SFB sequences are generally incongruent with those among S-RNase sequences for the same S-haplotypes. Hypotheses compatible with these results are discussed.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
ANDERSON, MA;CORNISH, EC;CLARKE, AE
通讯作者:
CLARKE, AE
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Richman, AD;Uyenoyama, MK;Kohn, JR
通讯作者:
Kohn, JR
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Boskovic, RI;Wolfram, B;Sonneveld, T
通讯作者:
Sonneveld, T
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Potter, D.;Eriksson, T.;Campbell, C. S.
通讯作者:
Campbell, C. S.
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Sijacic, P;Wang, X;Kao, TH
通讯作者:
Kao, TH