Creating academic-community partnerships to jointly enhance advocacy and research on violence and disability: Two case examples.
Creating academic-community partnerships to jointly enhance advocacy and research on violence and disability: Two case examples.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/tra0001135
复制
发表时间：
2022-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nicolaidis C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lund EM;Hughes RB;McDonald KE;Leotti S;Katz MR;Beers LM;Nicolaidis C
本文在两项与人际暴力和残疾有关的研究中描述了利用社区参与性研究（CBPR）促进双向和公平的学术-社区伙伴关系。我们分析了开展这些研究的方法和经验，重点关注在研究过程本身以及由此产生的评估和干预产品中，如何利用CBPR方法共同促进和加强围绕暴力和残疾的研究和宣传。我们使用的CBPR方法使我们能够识别和解决与残疾人社区暴力相关的关键问题，例如与残疾有关的暴力形式和经历，与强制性报告法相关的关切和障碍，以及难以获得的措施和干预措施，并在研究产品中解决这些问题。此外，我们的双向学术社区伙伴关系使我们能够解决研究过程本身的整体可及性问题，以此作为扩大科学倡导声音的一种手段。让残疾人充分、有意义和公平地参与研究进程的每一个阶段，有助于建立伙伴关系，共同推进围绕暴力和残疾问题的研究和宣传。
This article describes the use of community-based participatory research (CBPR) to foster bidirectional and equitable academic-community partnerships in two studies related to interpersonal violence and disability. We analyzed our methods and experiences in conducting these studies to focus on the ways in which CBPR methodology was used to jointly promote and enhance research and advocacy surrounding violence and disability in the research processes themselves and the resulting assessment and intervention products. Our use of CBPR methodology allowed us to identify and address critical issues related to violence in the disability community, such as disability-related forms and experiences of violence, concerns and barriers linked to mandated reporting laws, and inaccessible measures and interventions, and to address them in research products. Additionally, our bidirectional academic-community partnerships led us to address overall accessibility of the research process itself as a means by which to amplify advocate voices in science. Full, meaningful, and equitable participation of people with disabilities at every stage of the research process allows for the creation of partnerships that jointly advance research and advocacy around violence and disability.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Nosek, MA;Foley, CC;Howland, CA
通讯作者：
Howland, CA
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Hughes, Rosemary B.;Robinson-Whelen, Susan;Nicolaidis, Christina
通讯作者：
Nicolaidis, Christina
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Hughes, Rosemary B.;Robinson-Whelen, Susan;McDonald, Katherine E.
通讯作者：
McDonald, Katherine E.
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Hughes, Rosemary B.;Robinson-Whelen, Susan;Schwartz, Michelle (Shell)
通讯作者：
Schwartz, Michelle (Shell)
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Lund, Emily M.;Corr, Catherine P.;Schultz, Jared C.
通讯作者：
Schultz, Jared C.