Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact.
Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3325/cmj.2014.55.61
复制
发表时间：
2014-02
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Kitas GD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gasparyan AY;Ayvazyan L;Akazhanov NA;Kitas GD
分析多学科和专业生物医学期刊中的错误和不当行为。我们通过PubMed进行检索，以检索勘误表、重复和撤回的出版物（截至2014年1月30日）。为了分析各国、多学科和专业生物医学期刊的出版活动和引用概况，我们参考了SCImago Journal & Country Rank数据库的最新数据。记录了50个生产率最高的国家和多学科期刊的索引文章总数和h指数值，并将其与PubMed中重复和撤回的出版物数量相关联。我们的分析发现了2597个校正项。2013年更正数量出现了惊人的增长，主要是由于PLOS One的871（85.3%）次更正。重复出版物数量为1086份。经常重复发表的文章是综述（15.6%）、原始研究（12.6%）和病例报告（7.6%），而前三位撤回的文章是原始研究（10.1%）、随机试验（8.8%）和综述（7%）。不同国家发表的文献总数与重复（rs = 0.86，P < 0.001）和撤回（rs = 0.812，P < 0.001）之间存在强相关性。在基于国家的h指数值与重复和撤回的出版物之间发现了类似的趋势。 这项研究表明，生物医学中强化的自我纠正是由于读者和作者的注意，他们发现了循证信息中心的错误。数字化和开放获取混淆了更正通知和撤回的惊人增长。
To analyze mistakes and misconduct in multidisciplinary and specialized biomedical journals. We conducted searches through PubMed to retrieve errata, duplicate, and retracted publications (as of January 30, 2014). To analyze publication activity and citation profiles of countries, multidisciplinary, and specialized biomedical journals, we referred to the latest data from the SCImago Journal & Country Rank database. Total number of indexed articles and values of the h-index of the fifty most productive countries and multidisciplinary journals were recorded and linked to the number of duplicate and retracted publications in PubMed. Our analysis found 2597 correction items. A striking increase in the number of corrections appeared in 2013, which is mainly due to 871 (85.3%) corrections from PLOS One. The number of duplicate publications was 1086. Articles frequently published in duplicate were reviews (15.6%), original studies (12.6%), and case reports (7.6%), whereas top three retracted articles were original studies (10.1%), randomized trials (8.8%), and reviews (7%). A strong association existed between the total number of publications across countries and duplicate (rs = 0.86, P < 0.001) and retracted items (rs = 0.812, P < 0.001). A similar trend was found between country-based h-index values and duplicate and retracted publications. The study suggests that the intensified self-correction in biomedicine is due to the attention of readers and authors, who spot errors in their hub of evidence-based information. Digitization and open access confound the staggering increase in correction notices and retractions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.3
作者：
Hoskins, Wayne;Pollard, Henry;Dragasevic, George
通讯作者：
Dragasevic, George
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1212247109
发表时间：
2012-10-16
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Fang, Ferric C.;Steen, R. Grant;Casadevall, Arturo
通讯作者：
Casadevall, Arturo
影响因子：
4
作者：
Lee, Young Ho;Rho, Young Hee;Song, Gwan Gyu
通讯作者：
Song, Gwan Gyu
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Brembs B;Button K;Munafò M
通讯作者：
Munafò M
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Decullier, Evelyne;Huot, Laure;Maisonneuve, Herve
通讯作者：
Maisonneuve, Herve