Sleep-length differences are associated with altered longevity in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
Sleep-length differences are associated with altered longevity in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
复制标题
睡眠长度差异与果蝇果蝇的寿命改变有关。
DOI:
10.1242/bio.054361
复制
发表时间:
2020-09-16
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Bauer JH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thompson JB;Su OO;Yang N;Bauer JH
Sleep deprivation has been shown to negatively impact health outcomes, leading to decreased immune responses, memory loss, increased activity of stress and inflammatory pathways, weight gain, and even behavioral changes. These observations suggest that sleep deprivation substantially interferes with important physiological functions, including metabolic pathways of energy utilization. Many of those phenotypes are correlated with age, suggesting that disrupted sleep may interfere with the aging process. However, little is known about how sleep disruption affects aging and longevity. Here, we investigate this relationship using eight representative fruit fly lines from the Sleep Inbred Panel (SIP). The SIP consists of 39 inbred lines that display extreme short- and long-sleep patterns, and constitutes a crucial Drosophila community resource for investigating the mechanisms of sleep regulation. Our data show that flies with short-sleep periods have ∼16% longer life span, as well as reduced aging rate, compared to flies with long-sleep. In contrast, disrupting normal circadian rhythm reduces fly longevity. Short-sleep SIP flies moreover show slight metabolic differences to long-sleep lines, and to flies with disrupted circadian rhythm. These data suggest that the inbred SIP lines engage sleep mechanisms that are distinct from the circadian clock system. Summary: We show that fruit flies with shortened sleep patterns have decreased aging rates and increased longevity, while flies with disrupted circadian rhythm have decreased longevity. Our data suggests that circadian and sleep systems interact differentially with mechanisms of aging.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Bushey D;Hughes KA;Tononi G;Cirelli C
通讯作者:
Cirelli C
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Buxton OM;Pavlova M;Reid EW;Wang W;Simonson DC;Adler GK
通讯作者:
Adler GK
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Cappuccio FP;D'Elia L;Strazzullo P;Miller MA
通讯作者:
Miller MA
影响因子:
9.6
作者:
Calvin, Andrew D.;Carter, Rickey E.;Somers, Virend K.
通讯作者:
Somers, Virend K.
影响因子:
10.5
作者:
Kondratov, Roman V.;Kondratova, Anna A.;Antoch, Marina P.
通讯作者:
Antoch, Marina P.