Global COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Associated Social and Behavioral Factors.

Global COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Associated Social and Behavioral Factors.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/vaccines10010110
复制
发表时间:
2022-01-12
期刊:
影响因子:
7.8
通讯作者:
Khan SJ
Khan SJ
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shakeel CS;Mujeeb AA;Mirza MS;Chaudhry B;Khan SJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

COVID-19 疫苗在世界不同地区得到了不同程度的接受和犹豫,这对消除 COVID-19 大流行具有影响。本次系统评价的目的是研究不同国家和大洲对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受率和犹豫率如何以及为何存在差异。 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日期间,使用“COVID-19 疫苗接受度”等关键词对 PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore 和 Science Direct 进行了搜索。 81 份经过同行评审的出版物被发现符合评审资格。分析表明,不同人群对疫苗的接受程度存在全球差异。厄瓜多尔(97%)、马来西亚(94.3%)和印度尼西亚(93.3%)的成年人疫苗接受率最高,黎巴嫩成年人最低(21.0%)。接受率最高的是中国的普通医护人员(86.20%)和意大利的护士(91.50%),而刚果民主共和国的医护人员接受率最低(27.70%)。非参数单向方差分析显示,所分析国家之间的疫苗接受率差异具有统计显着性(H (49) = 75.302,p = 0.009*)。然而,疫苗犹豫和接受背后的原因总体上是相似的。疫苗接受度低与教育和意识水平低以及政府努力和举措效率低有关。此外,不良的流感疫苗接种史、与不孕不育相关的阴谋论以及社交媒体上有关 COVID-19 疫苗的错误信息也导致了人们对疫苗的犹豫不决。解决这些问题的策略可能会提高全球对 COVID-19 疫苗的接受度,并加速我们消除这一流行病的努力。
COVID-19 vaccines have met varying levels of acceptance and hesitancy in different parts of the world, which has implications for eliminating the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this systematic review is to examine how and why the rates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy differ across countries and continents. PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and Science Direct were searched between 1 January 2020 and 31 July 2021 using keywords such as “COVID-19 vaccine acceptance”. 81 peer-reviewed publications were found to be eligible for review. The analysis shows that there are global variations in vaccine acceptance among different populations. The vaccine-acceptance rates were the highest amongst adults in Ecuador (97%), Malaysia (94.3%) and Indonesia (93.3%) and the lowest amongst adults in Lebanon (21.0%). The general healthcare workers (HCWs) in China (86.20%) and nurses in Italy (91.50%) had the highest acceptance rates, whereas HCWs in the Democratic Republic of Congo had the lowest acceptance (27.70%). A nonparametric one-way ANOVA showed that the differences in vaccine-acceptance rates were statistically significant (H (49) = 75.302, p = 0.009*) between the analyzed countries. However, the reasons behind vaccine hesitancy and acceptance were similar across the board. Low vaccine acceptance was associated with low levels of education and awareness, and inefficient government efforts and initiatives. Furthermore, poor influenza-vaccination history, as well as conspiracy theories relating to infertility and misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine on social media also resulted in vaccine hesitancy. Strategies to address these concerns may increase global COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and accelerate our efforts to eliminate this pandemic.
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070701
发表时间: 2021-06-25
期刊: Vaccines
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Al-Sanafi M;Sallam M
通讯作者: Sallam M
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250495
发表时间: 2021
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Abedin M;Islam MA;Rahman FN;Reza HM;Hossain MZ;Hossain MA;Arefin A;Hossain A
通讯作者: Hossain A
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9030226
发表时间: 2021-03-05
期刊: Vaccines
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Alfageeh EI;Alshareef N;Angawi K;Alhazmi F;Chirwa GC
通讯作者: Chirwa GC
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32642-8
发表时间: 2021-01-02
期刊: Lancet (London, England)
影响因子: --
作者:
Burgess RA;Osborne RH;Yongabi KA;Greenhalgh T;Gurdasani D;Kang G;Falade AG;Odone A;Busse R;Martin-Moreno JM;Reicher S;McKee M
通讯作者: McKee M
DOI: 10.1111/jep.13581
发表时间: 2021-05-07
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Al-Metwali, Basma Zuheir;Al-Jumaili, Ali Azeez;Sorofman, Bernard
通讯作者: Sorofman, Bernard