Evaluating the perspectives of those with severe physical impairments while learning BCI control of a commercial augmentative and alternative communication paradigm.
Evaluating the perspectives of those with severe physical impairments while learning BCI control of a commercial augmentative and alternative communication paradigm.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/10400435.2021.1949405
复制
发表时间:
2023-01-02
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Brumberg JS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pitt KM;Brumberg JS
Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) techniques can provide access to communication for individuals with severe physical impairments. Brain-computer interface (BCI) access techniques may serve alongside existing AAC access methods to provide communication device control. However, there is limited information available about how individual perspectives change with motor-based BCI-AAC learning. Four individuals with ALS completed 12 BCI-AAC training sessions in which they made letter selections during an automatic row-column scanning pattern (see) via a motor-based BCI-AAC. Recurring measures were taken before and after each BCI-AAC training session to evaluate changes associated with BCI-AAC performance, and included measures of fatigue, frustration, mental effort, physical effort, device satisfaction and overall ease of device control. Levels of pre- to post- fatigue were low for use of the BCI-AAC system. However, participants indicated different perceptions of the term fatigue, with three participants discussing fatigue to be generally synonymous with physical effort, and one mental effort. Satisfaction with the BCI-AAC system was related to BCI-AAC performance for two participants, and levels of frustration for two participants. Considering a range of person-centered measures in future clinical BCI-AAC applications is important for optimizing and standardizing BCI-AAC assessment procedures. Key words: Brain-computer interface, augmentative and alternative communication, perspectives, fatigue, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, satisfaction
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Kübler A;Holz EM;Riccio A;Zickler C;Kaufmann T;Kleih SC;Staiger-Sälzer P;Desideri L;Hoogerwerf EJ;Mattia D
通讯作者:
Mattia D
DOI:
10.1016/0013-4694(78)90107-4
发表时间:
1978-01-01
期刊:
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子:
--
作者:
KUHLMAN, WN
通讯作者:
KUHLMAN, WN
影响因子:
2.4
作者:
Kasahara, Takashi;Terasaki, Kentaro;Masakado, Yoshihisa
通讯作者:
Masakado, Yoshihisa
DOI:
10.1080/2326263x.2016.1263916
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chavarriaga R;Fried-Oken M;Kleih S;Lotte F;Scherer R
通讯作者:
Scherer R
影响因子:
2
作者:
Fager, Susan Koch;Fried-Oken, Melanie;Beukelman, David R.
通讯作者:
Beukelman, David R.