Solving the paradox - (further) evidence for a quadratic relationship between in-group centrality and group-based guilt.
Solving the paradox - (further) evidence for a quadratic relationship between in-group centrality and group-based guilt.
复制标题
解决悖论——（进一步）证据表明群体内中心性和群体内疚感之间存在二次关系。
DOI：
10.1111/bjso.12310
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Markus Barth
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Torsten Masson;Markus Barth
之前关于群体认同感的强弱与集体对群体内错误行为的负罪感之间的关系的研究是混合的，为消极和积极的关系提供了证据。协调这些发现的一种可能的方法是探索非线性(二次)函数。来自两个问卷研究的相关数据(研究1)和实验数据(研究2)符合群体内自我中心性与集体内疚之间的二次关系(倒U形函数)。群体内中心性中等水平的集体负罪感最高，低中心性水平和高中心性水平的集体负罪感较低。此外，防御性群体内信念(即恢复积极群体形象的信念)也与群体内中心性(三次关系关系)呈非线性相关。我们的发现要求更详细地研究群体认同和集体内疚或群体防御之间可能存在的非线性关系。
Previous research on the relationship between strength of in-group identification and collective guilt about an in-group's wrongdoing is mixed, providing evidence for both a negative and a positive relationship. One possible way to reconcile these findings is to explore non-linear (quadratic) functions. Correlational data (Study 1) and experimental data (Study 2) from two questionnaire studies (Ntotal = 311) were in line with a quadratic relationship between self-centrality of the in-group and collective guilt (inverted U-shaped function). Collective guilt about a group's transgression was highest at medium levels of in-group centrality and lower for low and high levels of centrality, respectively. Additionally, defensive in-group beliefs (i.e., beliefs restoring a positive in-group image) were also associated non-linearly with in-group centrality (cubic relation relationship). Our findings call for a more detailed look on possible non-linear relationships between in-group identification and collective guilt or in-group defensiveness.
登录
查看更多内容
当不同意味着不好或仅仅更糟时最小和最大目标如何影响内群体投射和外群体态度
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Berthold;Mummendey;Kessler;Luecke;Schubert
通讯作者：
Schubert
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Christian von Scheve;Sven Ismer
通讯作者：
Christian von Scheve;Sven Ismer
德国多维度、多组成部分的社会认同衡量标准的调整和验证
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Mazziotta
通讯作者：
Mazziotta
最小和最大目标导向以及对违反规范的反应
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Fritsche;Kessler;Mummendey;Neumann
通讯作者：
Neumann