Clock position-based iris bow configuration after laser peripheral iridotomy in Chinese angle closure eyes: a swept source optical coherence tomography study
Clock position-based iris bow configuration after laser peripheral iridotomy in Chinese angle closure eyes: a swept source optical coherence tomography study
复制标题
中国人闭角眼激光周边虹膜切开术后基于时钟位置的虹膜弓配置:扫描源光学相干断层扫描研究
DOI:
10.1038/s41433-019-0601-1
复制
发表时间:
2019-09
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Xiulan Zhang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
shida chen;Yaoming Liu;Fei Li;Kai Gao;Rouxi Zhou;Xiulan Zhang
BackgroundTo determine how many measurements should be evaluated to determine the iris bow and evaluate changes of iris bow at 12 clock positions after LPI in primary angle closure eyes.MethodsA total of 93 primary angle closure eyes in 93 Chinese patients were enrolled. Anterior iris bowing was evaluated at 12 clock positions and 4 clock positions (3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock) before, 1 week and 3 months after LPI using swept source optical coherence tomography.ResultsAt baseline, almost all of the eyes exhibited an iris bow when measured using 12 clock positions, consistent with results obtained from measurements at 4 clock positions (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.99). LPI caused a relative unified change in all of the clock positions (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91) except the LPI site. After LPI, there was no significant difference between 12 and 4 clock position measurements for the iris bow (bothp> 0.05), with ~34.1% vs. 33% of the patients remained iris bow at 1 week and 34% vs. 31.9% of the patients remained iris bow at 3 months. However, the coexisting iris bow configuration was more common when measured using 4 clock positions (16.5% vs. 3.3% at 1 week and 25.5% vs. 10.6% at 3 months).ConclusionsThere was excellent consistency when measuring the iris bow at 4 or 12 clock positions. LPI caused a relatively unified iris bow change at 12 clock positions, and a single LPI relieved only ~2/3 of the iris bow configurations.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
Srinivasan, Kavitha;Zebardast, Nazlee;Ramulu, Pradeep Y.
通讯作者:
Ramulu, Pradeep Y.
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Moghimi, Sasan;Chen, Rebecca;Lin, Shan C.
通讯作者:
Lin, Shan C.
影响因子:
13.7
作者:
He, Mingguang;Friedman, David S.;Foster, Paul J.
通讯作者:
Foster, Paul J.
影响因子:
8.1
作者:
C. Zheng;Celeste P. Guzman;C. Cheung;Yingke He;D. Friedman;S. Ong;A. Narayanaswamy;P. Chew;S. Perera;T. Aung
通讯作者:
C. Zheng;Celeste P. Guzman;C. Cheung;Yingke He;D. Friedman;S. Ong;A. Narayanaswamy;P. Chew;S. Perera;T. Aung
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Nonaka, Atsushi;Iwawaki, Takuji;Kurimoto, Yasuo
通讯作者:
Kurimoto, Yasuo