Emotion regulation deficits in generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and their co-occurrence.
Emotion regulation deficits in generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and their co-occurrence.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.04.006
复制
发表时间：
2009-10
影响因子：
10.3
通讯作者：
Flanagan, Thomas J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mennin, Douglas S.;McLaughlin, Katie A.;Flanagan, Thomas J.
关键词：
初步证据支持情绪相关缺陷在广泛性焦虑症（GAD）中的作用，包括情绪强度升高，对情绪的理解不足，对情绪的负面认知反应以及适应不良的情绪管理。然而，问题仍然是关于这些情绪相关的缺陷的特异性相比，高度共病的条件，如社交焦虑障碍（SAD）。在目前的研究中，113名本科生管理措施的GAD，SAD，情绪相关因素，以澄清这些变量之间的关系。在单变量分析中，SAD的存在并没有显着影响GAD和情绪相关措施之间的关联。此外，判别函数分析显示，情绪强度和受损的调节策略提供了最大的区分组之间和最好的预测GAD的诊断（无论SAD合并症）。虽然他们的辨别能力较弱，但情绪理解能力差最能预测SAD的诊断（不考虑GAD合并症），而不接受情绪最能预测GAD和SAD合并症。
Preliminary evidence supports the role of emotion-related deficits in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), including heightened emotional intensity, poor understanding of emotion, negative cognitive reactivity to emotions, and maladaptive emotion management. However, questions remain concerning the specificity of these emotion-related deficits compared to highly comorbid conditions such as social anxiety disorder (SAD). In the current study, 113 undergraduate students were administered measures of GAD, SAD, and emotion-related factors in order to clarify relationships among these variables. In univariate analyses, presence of SAD did not significantly impact the association between GAD and the emotion-related measures. Further, a discriminant function analysis revealed that emotional intensity and impaired regulation strategies provided the greatest discrimination between groups and best predicted a diagnosis of GAD (regardless of SAD comorbidity). Although their discriminatory ability was weaker, poor emotional understanding best predicted a diagnosis of SAD (regardless of GAD comorbidity), and non-acceptance of emotions best predicted comorbid GAD and SAD.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Lynch, TR;Robins, CJ;Krause, ED
通讯作者：
Krause, ED
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Mennin, DS;Heimberg, RG;Fresco, DM
通讯作者：
Fresco, DM
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Salovey, P;Stroud, LR;Epel, ES
通讯作者：
Epel, ES
DOI：
10.1016/0005-7916(94)00064-s
发表时间：
1995-03-01
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
BORKOVEC, TD;ROEMER, L
通讯作者：
ROEMER, L
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
McLaughlin, Katie A.;Mennin, Douglas S.;Farach, Frank J.
通讯作者：
Farach, Frank J.