How Do Real and Falsified Data Differ? Psychology of Survey Response as a Source of Falsification Indicators in Face-to-Face Surveys
How Do Real and Falsified Data Differ? Psychology of Survey Response as a Source of Falsification Indicators in Face-to-Face Surveys
复制标题
真实数据和伪造数据有何不同?
DOI:
10.1093/ijpor/edt017
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Kemper
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Menold;Kemper
Interview falsifications in face-to-face surveys have the potential to seriously contaminate survey data. Thus, detection methods are of crucial importance. One idea is to use several falsification indicators derived from existing survey data. Here, real and falsified data are compared in two experimental studies. Response sets are used to develop formal indicators, and content of responses is used to develop content-related indicators. During the analysis, numerous formal indicators are tested and compared with content-related indicators. The results indicate that the majority of formal indicators allow for differentiation between real and false data, and, in addition, certain content-related indicators are useful for such differentiation. The results are discussed in terms of the usefulness of indicators in identifying potential falsifiers.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
Social Science Research Network
影响因子:
--
作者:
Joerg–Peter Schraepler;Gert G. Wagner
通讯作者:
Gert G. Wagner
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1991
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Schnell
通讯作者:
R. Schnell
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Sebastian Bredl;Nina Storfinger;Natalja Menold
通讯作者:
Natalja Menold
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
P. Winker;Natalja Menold;Nina Storfinger;Christoph J. Kemper
通讯作者:
Christoph J. Kemper
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1966
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Messick
通讯作者:
S. Messick