Rethinking growth coalition in urban village redevelopment: An empirical study of three villages in Zhuhai, China
Rethinking growth coalition in urban village redevelopment: An empirical study of three villages in Zhuhai, China
复制标题
重新思考城中村重建中的增长联盟：中国珠海三个村庄的实证研究
DOI：
10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102529
复制
发表时间：
2022-03
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
Liu Guiwen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zhang Zhengtao;Liu Yong;Liu Guiwen
虽然增长联盟理论在西方文献中被广泛用于解释城市更新，但考虑到不同的地方政治结构，它需要进行调整和调整，以适应中国复杂多样的城中村发展过程。通过对珠海三个村庄的案例分析，我们发现，增长联盟理论过分强调了政治精英和商业精英之间的联盟，而牺牲了村民和农村集体等其他行动者的利益。善昌案表明开发商和村民之间的紧密联盟，共同向当地政府提出额外的权利要求。当地政府在承认非法产权和增加允许建筑面积方面做出了让步，以促进拆迁的顺利实施。对比之下，李溪、福溪案例表明，当地政府在拆迁补偿阶段与农村集体结成联盟，在建设阶段与开发商结成联盟。该案例表明，政府除了倡导房地产主导增长外，还追求改善城市宜居性和促进工业发展的长期目标。本文揭示了增长联盟的多样性和复杂性，丰富了现有的框架。
Although growth coalition theory is widely used to explain urban renewal in Western literature, it needs to be adjusted and adapted to suit China's complex and diverse urban village development processes, considering the different local political structures. By analyzing three village cases in Zhuhai, we found that growth coalition theory overemphasized the increasing alliance between political and business elites at the expense of other actors such as villagers and rural collectives. The Shanchang case indicated the close coalition between the developer and the villagers to appeal jointly for additional rights from the local government. The local government made concessions about acknowledging illegal property rights and increasing allowable floor space to facilitate the smooth implementation of demolition. By contrast, the Lixi and Fuxi case showed that the local government formed a coalition with the rural collective in the demolition and compensation stage and formed an alliance with the developer in the construction stage. The case indicated that the government pursued the long-term goal of improving urban livability and enhancing industrial development apart from advocating property-led growth. This paper disclosed the diversity and complexity of the growth coalition, which could enrich the existing framework.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.2
作者：
S. Wong;Xingguang Chen;B. Tang;Jinlong Liu
通讯作者：
S. Wong;Xingguang Chen;B. Tang;Jinlong Liu
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Chen Ha
通讯作者：
Chen Ha
影响因子：
6.8
作者：
Hao, Pu;Sliuzas, Richard;Geertman, Stan
通讯作者：
Geertman, Stan
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Fan Wu;Ling-Hin Li;Sue Yurim Han
通讯作者：
Fan Wu;Ling-Hin Li;Sue Yurim Han
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Qing Yang;Yan Song;Yin-ying Cai
通讯作者：
Qing Yang;Yan Song;Yin-ying Cai