Studying Stereotype Accuracy from an Integrative Social‐Personality Perspective
Studying Stereotype Accuracy from an Integrative Social‐Personality Perspective
复制标题
从综合社会人格的角度研究刻板印象的准确性
DOI：
10.1111/spc3.12357
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Jin X. Goh
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Judith A. Hall;Jin X. Goh
本文提出了一个理解刻板印象的准确性和不准确性的综合框架。具体来说，我们强调了社会和人格心理学的研究问题和传统，这些问题和传统并不经常相交，但它们可以相互提供信息。在这个框架内，社会心理学家对群体刻板印象准确性的兴趣，在概念上很像人格心理学家对感知者识别个体类型的准确性的兴趣，例如外向者。这两个领域都或隐或显地利用个人属性和行为（线索）来评估关于群体或个人特征的信念的准确性。运用Brunswik的透镜模型视角，结合信号检测理论的概念，可以发现刻板印象判断的准确与否取决于感知者如何判断或使用线索。通过借鉴社会心理学和人格心理学的研究传统和理论框架，研究人员可以超越刻板印象准确性的全有或全无立场，从而更细致地了解刻板印象何时、如何以及在多大程度上是准确的。
This article proposes an integrative framework for understanding the accuracy and inaccuracy of stereotypes. Specifically, we highlight research issues and traditions from social and personality psychology that do not often intersect, but which can be mutually informative. Within this framework, the social psychologist's interest in the accuracy of group stereotypes is conceptually much like a personality psychologist's interest in the accuracy with which perceivers can identify types of individuals, for example extraverts. Both fields make use, implicitly or explicitly, of personal attributes and behaviors (cues) in assessing accuracy of beliefs about group or individual traits. By using Brunswik's lens model perspective in combination with concepts from signal detection theory, judgments of stereotypes can be discovered to be accurate or inaccurate depending on how perceivers judge or use the cues. In drawing on research traditions and theoretical frameworks from both social and personality psychology, researchers can go beyond an all-or-nothing stance regarding stereotype accuracy to achieve a more nuanced understanding of when, how, and to what extent stereotypes are accurate.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Costa, PT;Terracciano, A;McCrae, RR
通讯作者：
McCrae, RR
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
JUDD, CM;PARK, B
通讯作者：
PARK, B