'Verstehen ' ('understand') primes ' stehen ' ('stand'): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs
'Verstehen ' ('understand') primes ' stehen ' ('stand'): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs
复制标题
“理解”启动“站立”：在德语复杂动词的词汇表示中，形态结构凌驾于语义组合性之上
DOI：
10.1016/j.jml.2013.12.002
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Eulitz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Smolka;Preller;Eulitz
印欧语中单词的词汇表征通常被认为是由意义构成性驱动的。这项研究考察了德语中复杂动词的词汇表征，德语是印欧语中丰富的词法代表。三个外显启动实验操纵了形态、语义和形式关联性之间的主目标关系。基本动词(例如，Binden，‘Bind’)之前是语义相关(zubinden，‘tie’)或语义无关(entbinden，‘Deliver’)的派生词，是纯粹语义相关(zuschnüren，‘tie’)，形式相关(abbilden，‘Descric’)，或不相关(abholzen，‘deForest’)动词。为了确保加工过程对语义和形式加工的敏感性，实验3增加了语义联结(Messer-Gabel，‘刀叉’)和形式控制(Bordell-Bord，‘brothel-board’；bechreiben-Reiben，‘Describe-RUB’)。1和3)和听觉(Exp.2).语义促进(Exp.3)和形成抑制(Exp.2和3)在所有实验中都是不可靠的，而形态易化在所有三个实验中都很强，不受语义关联的影响。也就是说，来自语义不透明派生的启动与来自透明派生的启动是等价的。这些发现表明，复杂动词的词汇表征指的是基础，而不是意义的组合性。因此，德语的词汇表示法不同于其他印欧语。这一新的证据表明，在词汇表征的模型中包含跨语言差异是必要的。
The lexical representation of words in Indo-European languages is generally assumed to be driven by meaning compositionality. This study examined the lexical representation of complex verbs in German, which is a morphologically rich representative of Indo-European languages. Three overt priming experiments manipulated prime–target relations between morphological, semantic, and form relatedness. Base verbs (e.g.,binden, ‘bind’) were preceded by derivations that were semantically related (zubinden, ‘tie’) or semantically unrelated (entbinden, ‘deliver’), by purely semantically related (zuschnüren, ‘tie’), form-related (abbilden, ‘depict’), or unrelated (abholzen, ‘deforest’) verbs. To ensure that the procedures were sensitive to semantic and form processing, semantic associates (Messer–Gabel, ‘knife–fork’) and form controls (Bordell–Bord, ‘brothel–board’;beschreiben–reiben, ‘describe–rub’) were added in Experiment 3. To examine whether lexical representation is affected by modality, prime presentation was further varied between visual (Exp. 1 and 3) and auditory (Exp. 2).Semantic facilitation (Exp. 3) and form inhibition (Exp. 2 and 3) were not reliable across experiments, while morphological facilitation was strong and unaffected by semantic relatedness in all three experiments. That is, the priming from semantically opaque derivations was equivalent to that from transparent derivations. These findings indicate that the lexical representation of complex verbs refers to the base regardless of meaning compositionality. Lexical representations in German thus differ from those in other Indo-European languages. This new evidence points to the necessity to encompass cross-linguistic variations in the modeling of lexical representation.
登录
查看更多内容
长期形态启动的轨迹和时间过程
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Rueckl;Bruno Galantucci
通讯作者：
Bruno Galantucci
扩展霍金斯的比较类型学：日耳曼语言中的格、词序和动词一致性
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. D. Vogelaer
通讯作者：
G. D. Vogelaer
坎恩·曼·格申克·乌布林根
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Pienie Zwitserlood;Etta Drews;Agnes Bolwiender;Eveline Neuwinger
通讯作者：
Eveline Neuwinger
形态效应与共享意义和共享形式的效应有区别吗？
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1431
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Feldman,LB
通讯作者：
Feldman,LB
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Rueckl, JG;Mikolinski, M;Mars, F
通讯作者：
Mars, F