Differences in Availability and Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Residential Treatment Settings in the United States.
Differences in Availability and Use of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Residential Treatment Settings in the United States.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20843
复制
发表时间:
2020-02-05
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Dunn KE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Huhn AS;Hobelmann JG;Strickland JC;Oyler GA;Bergeria CL;Umbricht A;Dunn KE
The U.S. is in the midst of a deadly and protracted opioid crisis. While many individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) seek treatment at residential facilities to initiate long-term recovery, the availability and utilization of medications for OUD (MOUD) in these facilities is unclear. Examine differences in MOUD availability and utilization in residential facilities as a function of Medicaid policy, as well as facility-level and treatment admissions-level factors associated with MOUD availability and utilization, respectively. Observational, cross-sectional study of deidentified facility-level and admissions-level data from residential treatment facilities across the U.S. in 2017. Statistical analyses occurred in 2019. Residential facilities reporting to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Facility-level data were extracted from the 2017 National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (NSSATS), and admissions-level data from residential facilities were extracted from the 2017 Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions (TEDS-A). OUD admissions that identified opioids as their primary drug of choice at residential treatment facilities in the U.S. MOUD availability was defined as offering extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), buprenorphine, and/or methadone at a given residential facility. MOUD utilization was defined as the planned use of any MOUD during residential treatment. A relatively low percentage of residential treatment facilities (n=2,863) offered extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) (29.8%), buprenorphine (33.3%), or methadone (2.1%). Regarding residential treatment admissions (n=232,414), MOUD was utilized in only 17.3% and 1.9% of admissions in states that did or did not expand Medicaid, respectively (p<0.001). Residential facilities that offered no MOUD had lower odds than facilities that offered ≥1 MOUD of also offering psychiatric medications (odds ratio [OR]=0.06, 95% confidence intervals [CI]=0.05–0.08, p<0.001), being licensed by a state/hospital authority (OR=0.39, 95% CI=0.27–0.57, p<0.001), or accredited by a health organization (OR=0.28, 95% CI=0.23–0.33, p<0.001), and had higher odds of accepting cash-only payments (OR=4.80, 95% CI=3.47–6.64, p<0.001). In this cross-sectional study of residential addiction treatment facilities in the U.S., MOUD availability and utilization was sparse. Public health and policy efforts to improve access to and utilization of MOUD in residential treatment facilities could improve treatment outcomes for persons initiating recovery.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Chandler, Redonna K.;Fletcher, Bennett W.;Volkow, Nora D.
通讯作者:
Volkow, Nora D.
影响因子:
9.7
作者:
Clark, Robin E.;Samnaliev, Mihail;Leung, Gary Y.
通讯作者:
Leung, Gary Y.
影响因子:
9.7
作者:
Grogan, Colleen M.;Andrews, Christina;Friedmann, Peter D.
通讯作者:
Friedmann, Peter D.
DOI:
10.3109/10826088409057189
发表时间:
1984-01-01
期刊:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS
影响因子:
--
作者:
AIKEN, LS;LOSCIUTO, LA;BROWN, BS
通讯作者:
BROWN, BS
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Brunette, MF;Mueser, KT;Drake, RE
通讯作者:
Drake, RE