Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1353/cpr.2018.0010
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Eng E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Samuel CA;Lightfoot AF;Schaal J;Yongue C;Black K;Ellis K;Robertson L;Smith B;Jones N;Foley K;Kollie J;Mayhand A;Morse C;Guerrab F;Eng E
基于社区的参与式研究（CBPR）是一种合作和公平的研究方法;然而，建立和维护CBPR伙伴关系的过程可能具有挑战性。目前需要制定创新战略，促进伙伴关系的发展和长期可持续性。2010年，位于查佩尔山的北卡罗来纳州大学开发了CBPR Charrette模型，以促进利益相关者参与转化研究。描述癌症健康管理疼痛和症状责任（CHAMPS）研究如何利用CBPR charrette过程来发展和加强其CBPR伙伴关系并成功实现研究目标。14个CHAMPS社区，学术和医疗合作伙伴参加了CBPR charrette。两位共同主持人指导了charrette申请流程，并亲自讨论了伙伴关系的优势、需求和挑战。在CBPR和健康差异方面具有丰富经验的社区和学术专家在现场会议期间提供了技术援助和建议。总的来说，CHAMPS的伙伴关系从Charrette过程中受益匪浅。具体而言，通过鼓励就项目目标和实施、角色和责任以及补偿和沟通结构进行集体谈判，Charrette流程在CHAMPS合作伙伴之间产生了更大的透明度、问责制和信任。该过程还允许在社区和学术专家的支持下探索新发现的挑战和潜在的解决方案。此外，该charrette还作为CHAMPS社区，学术和医疗合作伙伴之间的能力建设的催化剂。未来的研究应比较CBPR Charrette相对于其他方法对伙伴关系发展和过程评价结果的影响。
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative and equitable approach to research inquiry; however, the process of establishing and maintaining CBPR partnerships can be challenging. There is ongoing need for innovative strategies that foster partnership development and long-term sustainability. In 2010, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill developed a CBPR charrette model to facilitate stakeholder engagement in translational research. To describe how the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms (CHAMPS) Study leveraged the CBPR charrette process to develop and strengthen its CBPR partnership and successfully implement research objectives. Fourteen CHAMPS community, academic, and medical partners participated in the CBPR charrette. Two co-facilitators guided the charrette application process and in-person discussion of partnership strengths, needs, and challenges. Community and academic experts with extensive experience in CBPR and health disparities provided technical assistance and recommendations during the in-person charrette. Overall, the CHAMPS partnership significantly benefited from the charrette process. Specifically, the charrette process engendered greater transparency, accountability, and trust among CHAMPS partners by encouraging collective negotiation of project goals and implementation, roles and responsibilities, and compensation and communication structures. The process also allowed for exploration of newly-identified challenges and potential solutions with support from community and academic experts. Furthermore, the charrette also functioned as a catalyst for capacity building among CHAMPS community, academic, and medical partners. Future studies should compare the impact of the CBPR charrette, relative to other approaches, on partnership development and process evaluation outcomes.
登录
查看更多内容
加强合作研究能力的模型：来自亚特兰大临床转化科学研究所的插图。
DOI：
10.1177/1090198113511815
发表时间：
2014-06
期刊：
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education
影响因子：
--
作者：
Rodgers KC;Akintobi T;Thompson WW;Evans D;Escoffery C;Kegler MC
通讯作者：
Kegler MC
DOI：
10.1097/acm.0000000000000794
发表时间：
2015-12
期刊：
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
影响因子：
--
作者：
Joosten YA;Israel TL;Williams NA;Boone LR;Schlundt DG;Mouton CP;Dittus RS;Bernard GR;Wilkins CH
通讯作者：
Wilkins CH
基于社区的参与性研究：从儿童环境健康和疾病预防研究中心汲取的教训。
影响因子：
10.4
作者：
Israel, Barbara A;Parker, Edith A;Rowe, Zachary;Salvatore, Alicia;Minkler, Meredith;Lopez, Jesus;Butz, Arlene;Mosley, Adrian;Coates, Lucretia;Lambert, George;Potito, Paul A;Brenner, Barbara;Rivera, Maribel;Romero, Harry;Thompson, Beti;Coronado, Gloria;Halstead, Sandy
通讯作者：
Halstead, Sandy
DOI：
10.1353/cpr.2013.0018
发表时间：
2013-06-01
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Bone, Lee R.;Edington, Kristen;Ford, Jean G.
通讯作者：
Ford, Jean G.
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Metzler, MM;Higgins, DL;Softley, D
通讯作者：
Softley, D