When scenes speak louder than words: Verbal encoding does not mediate the relationship between scene meaning and visual attention.
When scenes speak louder than words: Verbal encoding does not mediate the relationship between scene meaning and visual attention.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13421-020-01050-4
复制
发表时间：
2020-10
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Ferreira F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rehrig G;Hayes TR;Henderson JM;Ferreira F
视觉世界的复杂性要求我们限制视觉注意力，并优先考虑场景中的某些区域。本研究探讨了言语编码过程是否会影响注意力在场景中的分配。具体来说，我们问的优势，场景意义的图像显着性的注意力引导调制的口头编码，因为我们经常使用语言来处理信息。在两个实验中，60名受试者研究场景（N1 = 30，N2 = 60），每个场景12秒，为场景识别任务做准备。一半的时间里，受试者在观看场景的同时进行二级发音抑制任务。每个实验场景的意义和显着性图进行了量化。在这两个实验中，我们发现，意义解释更多的变化，在视觉注意比图像的显着性，特别是当我们控制的意义和显着性之间的重叠，有和没有抑制任务。基于这些结果，言语编码过程并没有出现调节场景意义和视觉注意之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明，在场景中的语义信息引导的注意船，与认知指导理论相一致。
The complexity of the visual world requires that we constrain visual attention and prioritize some regions of the scene for attention over others. The current study investigated whether verbal encoding processes influence how attention is allocated in scenes. Specifically, we asked whether the advantage of scene meaning over image salience in attentional guidance is modulated by verbal encoding, given that we often use language to process information. In two experiments, 60 subjects studied scenes (N1 = 30, N2 = 60) for 12 seconds each in preparation for a scene recognition task. Half of the time, subjects engaged in a secondary articulatory suppression task concurrent with scene viewing. Meaning and saliency maps were quantified for each of the experimental scenes. In both experiments, we found that meaning explained more of the variance in visual attention than image salience did, particularly when we controlled for the overlap between meaning and salience, with and without the suppression task. Based on these results, verbal encoding processes do not appear to modulate the relationship between scene meaning and visual attention. Our findings suggest that semantic information in the scene steers the attentional ship, consistent with cognitive guidance theory.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Meyer, Antje S.;Belke, Eva;Humphreys, Glyn W.
通讯作者：
Humphreys, Glyn W.
DOI：
10.1037/xhp0000413
发表时间：
2017-09
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
影响因子：
--
作者：
Allen RJ;Baddeley AD;Hitch GJ
通讯作者：
Hitch GJ
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1720419115
发表时间：
2018-11-06
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Majid, Asifa;Roberts, Sean G.;Levinson, Stephen C.
通讯作者：
Levinson, Stephen C.
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00507.x
发表时间：
2007-08-01
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Henderson, John M.
通讯作者：
Henderson, John M.
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Meyer, Antje S.;Damian, Markus F.
通讯作者：
Damian, Markus F.