A decade after the metabolomics standards initiative it's time for a revision.
A decade after the metabolomics standards initiative it's time for a revision.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/sdata.2017.138
复制
发表时间:
2017-09-26
期刊:
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Steinbeck C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Spicer RA;Salek R;Steinbeck C
A recent analysis of publicly available metabolomics data shows that the MSI guidelines are not well abided to in publicly shared metabolomics studies. We propose that the MSI guidelines should be revisited and revised, as has been done in other communities, to fit the current community needs.In the year 2005, leading experts in metabolomics, with support from the Metabolomics Society, gathered to discuss metabolomics experimental standards and formed the metabolomics standards initiative (MSI) 1. Two years later, the MSI published a series of reporting standards for metabolomics 2–8. Another 5 years passed until a network of global repositories 9–11 for metabolomics data arose, to which the MSI guidelines could be applied. Now, as of 2nd August 2017, there are more than 700 metabolomics datasets publicly available via MetabolomeXchange (http://www. metabolomexchange. org/), which, for the first time, allows for an assessment of metabolomics data sharing and compliance with the MSI guidelines. In the decade since the first publication of the MSI reporting standards, the metabolomics community has matured. There is now greater understanding of genetic and environmental factors that can induce significant effects on the metabolome. The general purpose metabolomics data repositories MetaboLights 9 and Metabolomics Workbench 10, along with the smaller more specific repositories, MetaPhen 12 and MeRy-B 13, were designed to adhere with the MSI guidelines for minimum metadata reporting. We have performed a study assessing the compliance of the datasets in the MetaboLights, Metabolomics Workbench, MetaPhen, and MeRy-B repositories. It was found that many of the MSI’s minimal reporting standards are not complied with by many of the studies in these repositories (Fig. 1 shows examples from the MetaboLights repository). There were no MSI standards that were complied with in every publicly available study. There are, however, minimal reporting standards that are not applicable to every study eg, treatment, which is only relevant to studies including a treatment. Being only applicable to a small subset of studies may result in the low percentage compliance to these standards (Fig. 1).
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Haug K;Salek RM;Conesa P;Hastings J;de Matos P;Rijnbeek M;Mahendraker T;Williams M;Neumann S;Rocca-Serra P;Maguire E;González-Beltrán A;Sansone SA;Griffin JL;Steinbeck C
通讯作者:
Steinbeck C
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
van der Werf, Mariet J.;Takors, Ralf;Smedsgaard, Jorn;Nielsen, Jens;Ferenci, Tom;Portais, Jean Charles;Wittmann, Christoph;Hooks, Mark;Tomassini, Alberta;Oldiges, Marco;Fostel, Jennifer;Sauer, Uwe
通讯作者:
Sauer, Uwe
DOI:
10.1016/j.csbj.2015.01.002
发表时间:
2015-01-01
影响因子:
6
作者:
Everett, Jeremy R.
通讯作者:
Everett, Jeremy R.
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Fiehn, Oliver;Robertson, Don;Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
通讯作者:
Sansone, Susanna-Assunta
DOI:
10.1093/bioinformatics/btq415
发表时间:
2010-09-15
期刊:
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Rocca-Serra P;Brandizi M;Maguire E;Sklyar N;Taylor C;Begley K;Field D;Harris S;Hide W;Hofmann O;Neumann S;Sterk P;Tong W;Sansone SA
通讯作者:
Sansone SA