Motivations to combine alcohol and nicotine in college students: A validation of the Alcohol and Nicotine Motives Scale.
Motivations to combine alcohol and nicotine in college students: A validation of the Alcohol and Nicotine Motives Scale.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106645
复制
发表时间：
2021-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Plisiewicz A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Waldron KA;Mallett KA;Turrisi RJ;Reavy R;Wolfe E;Plisiewicz A
关于酒精和尼古丁结合的研究（ALCNIC）表明，这种危险行为比单独使用酒精或尼古丁导致的后果要严重得多。目前还没有措施来评估ALCNIC限制干预和预防工作的动机。本研究开发了一个心理测量的声音和多维的措施ALCNIC动机（ANMS）。ALCNIC项目的初始项目池是从大学生饮酒，焦点小组和个人访谈的文献中开发的。研究1涉及来自东北大学的学生，他们完成了关于ALCNIC项目的在线调查（N=55; 57.1%为女性;法师=20.3）。探索性因素分析（Exploratory Factor Analysis）。研究2涉及交叉验证的全国样本的大学生（N=336; 49.7%的女性;法师=21.2）完成相同的调查项目。使用结构方程模型评估了验证性因素分析、标准相关效度（ALCNIC/周末饮酒）和判别效度（社会期望）。两项研究的结果揭示了参与ALCNIC的三个因素：对抗性（聚会时间更长），协同效应（增强效应）和社会性（同伴压力）;以及避免ALCNIC的一个因素：负面效应（感到焦虑）（所有α> 0.7）。在研究2中，标准相关效度显示，协同动机与ALCNIC使用显着正相关;和负效应动机与ALCNIC使用显着负相关。判别效度显示，ALCNIC分量表与社会期望（除社会）没有显着相关。这项研究开发了一个可靠和有效的措施的动机使用ALCNIC。结果是强大的交叉验证两个样本的大学生。这些措施为干预和预防工作提供了目标。
Research on combining alcohol and nicotine (ALCNIC) has shown this risky behavior results in significantly more consequences than using either alcohol or nicotine alone. No measures currently exist to assess ALCNIC motives limiting intervention and prevention efforts. The present study developed a psychometrically sound and multidimensional measure of ALCNIC motives (the ANMS). An initial item pool of ALCNIC items was developed from literature on college student drinking, focus groups, and individual interviews. Study 1 involved students from a northeastern university who completed an online survey on the ALCNIC items (N=55; 57.1% female; Mage=20.3). Analysis focused on reliability (exploratory factor analysis). Study 2 involved a cross-validation national sample of college students (N=336; 49.7% female; Mage=21.2) completing the same survey items. Confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity (ALCNIC/weekend drinking), and discriminant validity (social desirability) were assessed using structural equation modeling. Results across two studies revealed three factors to engage in ALCNIC: antagonistic (party longer), synergistic (enhanced effects), and social (peer pressure); and one factor to avoid ALCNIC: negative effects (feeling anxious) (all alphas > 0.7). In study 2, criterion-related validity revealed that synergistic motives were significantly positively associated with ALCNIC use; and negative effects motives were significantly negatively associated with ALCNIC use. Discriminant validity showed ALCNIC subscales were not significantly associated with social desirability (except social). The study developed a reliable and valid measure of motives for ALCNIC use. Results were robust to cross-validation across two samples of college students. These measures provide targets for intervention and prevention efforts.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
McKee, SA;Hinson, R;Petrelli, P
通讯作者：
Petrelli, P
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Reed, Mark B.;Wang, Rong;Lange, James E.
通讯作者：
Lange, James E.
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Shiffman, Saul;Dunbar, Michael S.;Tindle, Hilary A.
通讯作者：
Tindle, Hilary A.
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Hefner, Kathryn R.;Sollazzo, Antonietta;Sofuoglu, Mehmet
通讯作者：
Sofuoglu, Mehmet
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Droste, Nicolas;Tonner, Lorraine;Miller, Peter
通讯作者：
Miller, Peter